[ChineseGP] [Koreangp] CJK Joint meeting record and homework

[KIM Kyongsok]

Dear Mr. Hotta:

Thanks for your efforts.


On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:39 PM, HiroHOTTA <hotta at jprs.co.jp> wrote:
> Dear Wang Wei, Prof. Kim, Kenny, and all CJK colleagues,
>
> In Beijing, we decided to renumber our action items by
> inserting previous action items into Beijing action item
> list.
> If you don't have any concerns, JGP can take the role of
> this renumbering task and sending you the new action item
> list in a couple of days.

All right.

> Any concerns?

No.

Thanks.

KIM, K.
>
> Regards,
> Hiro
>
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:18:27 +0800
> 王? <wangwei at cnic.cn> wrote:
>> Dear All
>>
>>       Please find the attached documents of meeting agenda & record, and
>> the action item (homework)
>>
>>       Thanks everyone who join the meeting in the two days. We will keep
>> working on it.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> WANG Wei
>>
>> -----?件原件-----
>> ?件人: chinesegp-bounces at icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces at icann.org] 代
>> 表 HiroHOTTA
>> ?送??: 2016年3月21日 8:53
>> 收件人: ChineseGP at icann.org; JapaneseGP at icann.org; KoreanGP at icann.org
>> 主?: [ChineseGP] how 'blocked' can help us
>>
>> (During 4 hours struggle with the letters without significant  output ...)
>>
>> A question has come to my mind and won't disappear...
>>
>> What are the future of "allocatable labels"?
>>
>> Let's assume the case where
>>   registrant-X applied for label-A,
>>   and label-B is marked as 'allocatable' by LGR,
>>   then, label-A is delegated to registrant-X.
>>
>> As far as I understand, the above means "only registrant-X has the right to
>> apply for label-B in the future." If registrant-X wants label-B to be
>> delegated, he/she needs to make a separate application to ICANN. And ICANN
>> will evaluate the label-B by a human panel (maybe supported by some
>> automatic mechanism).
>>
>> Then, what's the difference between
>> (1) all variants are allocatable
>> (2) some variants are allocatable and the others are blocked
>>     (or invalid)
>>
>> I understand (2) can make the applicant know that the application for some
>> strings (that are blocked/invalid) will definitely be rejected in any case.
>> However, this does not reduce the number of TLD delegations significantly
>> because the applicant does want only a few variant TLDs in reality, for
>> money-wise reason or usage-wise reason.
>>
>> then,,,,, why is (1) so evil?
>>
>> Hiro
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ChineseGP mailing list
>> ChineseGP at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Koreangp mailing list
> Koreangp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/koreangp
>



-- 
김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok