[ChineseGP] 答复: : [agenda] CJK+IP meeting at 9:00UTC on Thursday 10 March 2016
王伟
wangwei at cnic.cn
Thu Mar 10 11:11:14 UTC 2016
Homework1: The ratio of the labels which contain both traditional
character and simplified character in .CN (and .TW) registration data.
For .TW, due to the registration policy, no simp-trad-mixed labels
are registered under .TW.
For .CN, due to similar registration policy, 894903 domain names
have only one label (simplified one and traditional one are the same),
486440 domain names have 2 variant labels (all simplified and all
traditional), 508 domain names have 3 labels (original, all simplified
and all traditional), so ratio is 508/(508+894903+486440)=0.04%
As you see above, the registration policy will obviously restrict
registrant to have mixed variant labels.
Homework2: The maximum number of labels that are variant of each
other in .CN (and .TW)
For .TW, theoretically the maximum number of variant label number is
518440, belongs to a domain name whose label length is 19.
ø·À²¿
¢Ö\±¾²¿ÂºÏ×÷ðÓ¾¼°Êt°lÕ¹ÊÒ.̨³
(xn--2qqy4es6a3a7zn3nttjpmbn81ar8lw0tkvvcgw53h2v1bgddmu8ada538w.xn--kpry57d)
For .CN, theoretically the maximum number of variant label number is
over 20,000,000, belongs to a domain name whose label length is 21. (CNNIC
is reviewing the detailed document, might sent out later)
-----ÓʼþÔ¼þ-----
·¢¼þÈË: chinesegp-bounces at icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces at icann.org] ´ú
±í HiroHOTTA
·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2016Äê3ÔÂ10ÈÕ 11:10
ÊÕ¼þÈË: ChineseGP at icann.org; JapaneseGP at icann.org; KoreanGP at icann.org
Ö÷Ìâ: Re: [ChineseGP] : [agenda] CJK+IP meeting at 9:00UTC on Thursday 10
March 2016
materials for discussion are attached to this mail
==================================================
10 Mar 2016
Proposed by Hiro
[agenda] CJK coordination meeting on 10 Mar 2016
date/time
March 10 2016
<part1> with IP 09:00-10:15
<part2> without IP 10:30-11:45
place
Amandier room
remote participation (to be confirmed)
https://icann.adobeconnect.com/lgr/
participants (assumed to be)
CGP on site : Chris Dillon
remote : Wang Wei, Kenny Huang, Declan MA, Jiankang YAO
JGP on site : Hiro Hotta, Yuri Takamatsu
remote : Yoshiro Yoneya
KGP on site : KIM Kyongsok, Eung-jun Jeon
advisor : Edmon Chung
IP on site : Michel Suignard, Marc Blanchet
ICANN : Sarmad Hussain
agenda
<part1>
1. rationale of "the number of allocatable lables should be small"
rationale is hoped to be described in writing
- why small?
- how small?
- aspect of reduction
+ reduction of characters?
+ reduction of variant characters?
+ reduction of variant labels by WLE?
+ :
2. complement process for LGR
what kind of process can be incorporated into the whole application
evaluation process
- JGP will give some hints regarding complement process for LGR
==) file "ComplementRootLGR.pptx" attached
3. AOB
<part2>
1. action items review
==) pasted below
2. discussion between C/J/K
- especially about the unacceptable variants stated by KGP
3. preparation for Beijing meeting
date: 3/20 10:00-17:00 or 18:00
3/21 9:00-17:00 or 18:00
participants: (to be confirmed)
CGP Wangwei, Declan Ma, Jiangkan Yao, Chris Dillon(remotely)
JGP Hiro, Yoneya, Yuri, (Maemura; TBD)
KGP Prof.Kim, KISA, Hanja professional
==) proposed agenda pasted
"2016 March 20-21 CJK Coordination Meeting Agenda Update.docx"
Hiro
------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ action Item List [ICANN Dublin + Marrakech] as of 6/Mar/2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
D : from Dublin CJK meetings
M : from Marrakech meetings
If any progress has been made on the action item after 6 March, the status
of the action item is shown on the line beginning with ==>
D1. CGP will check and share the ratio of the labels which contain
both traditional character and simplified character
in .CN (and .TW) registration data to C and K.
==> done (Wang Wei provided the result to the mailing list)
D3. Yoneya will re-write the name of the title from "Algorithm" to
"Procedure" and add some explanation (especially regarding 'review')
to the "Algorithm" (now "Procedure") document before Beijing
Meeting.
D4. Each of CJK GPswill share their own repertoire and variants in
both XML and excel format. If GP doesn't have them in both
formats, send them only in the existing format.
D5. CJK will check and confirm the template of Root LGR proposal
and ask for IP's advice if necessary
step1: Yoneya will send the edited template to CJK mailing lists
which includes differentiation mark <common> for CJK and
<individual> for each GP
step2: CJK will check the drafted template and confirm
step3: ask for IP's advice if necessary
D6. CGP will investigate and share the maximum number of labels that
are variant of each other in .CN (and .TW) to CJK ML.
==> done (Wang Wei provided the result to the mailing list)
D7. CGP and KGP will devise a joint statement and then KGP will
consider whether to make a joint statement with C and J in KGP
LGR proposal
D10. Yoneya will draft a temporary schedule for each step of CJK
integration procedure and send it to Kenny for his check. After
that. Yoneya and Kenny will share it with CJK mailing lists to
solicit their opinions about the schedule
M1. Wang Wei will send first draft agenda of Beijing Meeting
==> done (Wang Wei provided a draft to the mailing list)
M2. Edmon will provide to CGP/JGP/KGP an analysis document regarding
possible scenarios for import and export of variants among 3
GPs before Beijing Meeting. (about 8-10 slides) [Edmon]
M3. Hiro will send the confirmed time schedle of Beijing Meeting
to the whole CJK GP's.
date: 3/20 10:00-17:00 or 18:00
3/21 9:00-17:00 or 18:00
participant: (to be confirmed)
CGP Wang Wei, Declan Ma, Jiangkan Yao, Chris (remotely)
JGP Hiro, Yoneya, Yuri, (maemura; TBD)
KGP Prof.Kim, KISA, Hanja professional
M4. Hiro will check the environment of CJK Coordination Meeting
planned on 10th March to Sarmad.
+ availability of Adobe connect
+ participation of IP
+ start time (9:00-10:15 or 10:30-11:45)
==> done (shown at the top of this mail)
M5. Each of CJK GPs will consider whether each GP has other issues
to be discussed other than coordination of variant definition
among GPs.
If there's some issues, share them to CJK mailing list by 9th
March.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the ChineseGP
mailing list