[ChineseGP] [Japanesegp] scenario consideration

[HiroHOTTA]

Hi Edmon, 


just have seen first slides, but am sending my feeling before going 
to the flight gate of Haneda.



please give slide# to each slide.

slide4
  More elaboration needed for "CNNIC statistics show that 
  10% of DNS queries are for the IDN variant".
  Does this mean 10% of .CN DNS queries are for IDNs that 
  have variants?  Or, does this mean 10% of IDN.CN queries 
  are for variat IDNs that are not registered in DNS?

slide5
 “new character form” and “old character form” recognized 
  as variants
      should be rewrote as 
 “new character form” and “old character form” recognized 
  as variants in many cases by some Japanese people

slide10
  "string similarity"
      should be more clear in definition , such as 
  "visual similarity" or "meaning similarity" or ...

from slide6 and onward
  it should be stated that '體' is (not) 
  in J repertoire / K repertoire

slide 13
  is the tile #“Conservativeness” in beginning. Can be Relaxed 
  in the Future" is a general statement or (y)our wish ot general 
   purpose or ...

Hiro


On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:08:16 +0800
"Edmon Chung" <edmon at registry.asia> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> As proposed, please find attached slides attempting to describe possible
> scenarios to approach Han coordination focusing on the CGP/KGP disparities
> at this time.  This incorporates some suggestions/comments from the CDNC
> meetings just concluded.
> 
> I have not included KGP in the distribution, looking for feedback from JGP
> and CGP first, or perhaps at our meeting.
> 
> Edmon