[ChineseGP] [Japanesegp] scenario consideration

[HiroHOTTA]

additional comments :

slide15
  for RANT, "Sometimes will applyfor multiple"
  this is true, but I need to confirm that
  for RANT, I think "Sometimes diffenet RANT want to register 
  a domain name that is a variant of a registered domain name".
  I hope Yoneya can verify this statement from the SLD.jp 
  registry database.

Hiro



On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:48:06 +0900
HiroHOTTA <hotta at jprs.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi Edmon, 
> 
> 
> just have seen first slides, but am sending my feeling before going 
> to the flight gate of Haneda.
> 
> 
> 
> please give slide# to each slide.
> 
> slide4
>   More elaboration needed for "CNNIC statistics show that 
>   10% of DNS queries are for the IDN variant".
>   Does this mean 10% of .CN DNS queries are for IDNs that 
>   have variants?  Or, does this mean 10% of IDN.CN queries 
>   are for variat IDNs that are not registered in DNS?
> 
> slide5
>  “new character form” and “old character form” recognized 
>   as variants
>       should be rewrote as 
>  “new character form” and “old character form” recognized 
>   as variants in many cases by some Japanese people
> 
> slide10
>   "string similarity"
>       should be more clear in definition , such as 
>   "visual similarity" or "meaning similarity" or ...
> 
> from slide6 and onward
>   it should be stated that '體' is (not) 
>   in J repertoire / K repertoire
> 
> slide 13
>   is the tile #“Conservativeness” in beginning. Can be Relaxed 
>   in the Future" is a general statement or (y)our wish ot general 
>    purpose or ...
> 
> Hiro
> 
> 
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:08:16 +0800
> "Edmon Chung" <edmon at registry.asia> wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> > 
> > As proposed, please find attached slides attempting to describe possible
> > scenarios to approach Han coordination focusing on the CGP/KGP disparities
> > at this time.  This incorporates some suggestions/comments from the CDNC
> > meetings just concluded.
> > 
> > I have not included KGP in the distribution, looking for feedback from JGP
> > and CGP first, or perhaps at our meeting.
> > 
> > Edmon