[ChineseGP] [Japanesegp] scenario consideration

[Edmon Chung]

Much thanks Hiro,
Not sure if my email (from mobile) got to the mailing lists properly
(attached again cause it said my mail was requiring moderation earlier)

Will update the slides 4, 5, 10, 13 and 15.

I did find the character in both JGP and KGP...

JGP:
<char cp="9AD4" tag="sc:Hani">
    <var cp="9AD4" type="allocatable" comment="identity" />
  </char>

KGP:
5857	體	9AD4	體	9AD4	A

I will just use the example for now if that is ok, maybe will find a better
example later.

Edmon



> -----Original Message-----
> From: hotta at jprs.co.jp [mailto:hotta at jprs.co.jp]
> Sent: Saturday, 19 March 2016 21:51 PM
> To: Edmon Chung <edmon at registry.asia>
> Cc: ChineseGP at icann.org; JapaneseGP at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Japanesegp] scenario consideration
>
> additional comments :
>
> slide15
>   for RANT, "Sometimes will applyfor multiple"
>   this is true, but I need to confirm that
>   for RANT, I think "Sometimes diffenet RANT want to register
>   a domain name that is a variant of a registered domain name".
>   I hope Yoneya can verify this statement from the SLD.jp
>   registry database.
>
> Hiro
>
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:48:06 +0900
> HiroHOTTA <hotta at jprs.co.jp> wrote:
> > Hi Edmon,
> >
> >
> > just have seen first slides, but am sending my feeling before going to
> > the flight gate of Haneda.
> >
> >
> >
> > please give slide# to each slide.
> >
> > slide4
> >   More elaboration needed for "CNNIC statistics show that
> >   10% of DNS queries are for the IDN variant".
> >   Does this mean 10% of .CN DNS queries are for IDNs that
> >   have variants?  Or, does this mean 10% of IDN.CN queries
> >   are for variat IDNs that are not registered in DNS?
> >
> > slide5
> >  “new character form” and “old character form” recognized
> >   as variants
> >       should be rewrote as
> >  “new character form” and “old character form” recognized
> >   as variants in many cases by some Japanese people
> >
> > slide10
> >   "string similarity"
> >       should be more clear in definition , such as
> >   "visual similarity" or "meaning similarity" or ...
> >
> > from slide6 and onward
> >   it should be stated that '體' is (not)
> >   in J repertoire / K repertoire
> >
> > slide 13
> >   is the tile #“Conservativeness” in beginning. Can be Relaxed
> >   in the Future" is a general statement or (y)our wish ot general
> >    purpose or ...
> >
> > Hiro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:08:16 +0800
> > "Edmon Chung" <edmon at registry.asia> wrote:
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > As proposed, please find attached slides attempting to describe
> > > possible scenarios to approach Han coordination focusing on the
> > > CGP/KGP disparities at this time.  This incorporates some
> > > suggestions/comments from the CDNC meetings just concluded.
> > >
> > > I have not included KGP in the distribution, looking for feedback
> > > from JGP and CGP first, or perhaps at our meeting.
> > >
> > > Edmon
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "Edmon" <edmon at dot.asia>
Subject: Re: [Japanesegp] scenario consideration
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:50:01 +0800
Size: 3687
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/chinesegp/attachments/20160320/35505233/attachment.mht>