[ChineseGP] [Japanesegp] scenario consideration

[Edmon Chung]

updated slide deck for today.
Edmon


> -----Original Message-----
> From: chinesegp-bounces at icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces at icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Edmon Chung
> Sent: Sunday, 20 March 2016 07:52 AM
> To: hotta at jprs.co.jp
> Cc: JapaneseGP at icann.org; ChineseGP at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [ChineseGP] [Japanesegp] scenario consideration
>
> Much thanks Hiro,
> Not sure if my email (from mobile) got to the mailing lists properly
(attached again
> cause it said my mail was requiring moderation earlier)
>
> Will update the slides 4, 5, 10, 13 and 15.
>
> I did find the character in both JGP and KGP...
>
> JGP:
> <char cp="9AD4" tag="sc:Hani">
>     <var cp="9AD4" type="allocatable" comment="identity" />
>   </char>
>
> KGP:
> 5857	體	9AD4	體	9AD4	A
>
> I will just use the example for now if that is ok, maybe will find a
better example later.
>
> Edmon
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: hotta at jprs.co.jp [mailto:hotta at jprs.co.jp]
> > Sent: Saturday, 19 March 2016 21:51 PM
> > To: Edmon Chung <edmon at registry.asia>
> > Cc: ChineseGP at icann.org; JapaneseGP at icann.org
> > Subject: Re: [Japanesegp] scenario consideration
> >
> > additional comments :
> >
> > slide15
> >   for RANT, "Sometimes will applyfor multiple"
> >   this is true, but I need to confirm that
> >   for RANT, I think "Sometimes diffenet RANT want to register
> >   a domain name that is a variant of a registered domain name".
> >   I hope Yoneya can verify this statement from the SLD.jp
> >   registry database.
> >
> > Hiro
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:48:06 +0900
> > HiroHOTTA <hotta at jprs.co.jp> wrote:
> > > Hi Edmon,
> > >
> > >
> > > just have seen first slides, but am sending my feeling before going
> > > to the flight gate of Haneda.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > please give slide# to each slide.
> > >
> > > slide4
> > >   More elaboration needed for "CNNIC statistics show that
> > >   10% of DNS queries are for the IDN variant".
> > >   Does this mean 10% of .CN DNS queries are for IDNs that
> > >   have variants?  Or, does this mean 10% of IDN.CN queries
> > >   are for variat IDNs that are not registered in DNS?
> > >
> > > slide5
> > >  “new character form” and “old character form” recognized
> > >   as variants
> > >       should be rewrote as
> > >  “new character form” and “old character form” recognized
> > >   as variants in many cases by some Japanese people
> > >
> > > slide10
> > >   "string similarity"
> > >       should be more clear in definition , such as
> > >   "visual similarity" or "meaning similarity" or ...
> > >
> > > from slide6 and onward
> > >   it should be stated that '體' is (not)
> > >   in J repertoire / K repertoire
> > >
> > > slide 13
> > >   is the tile #“Conservativeness” in beginning. Can be Relaxed
> > >   in the Future" is a general statement or (y)our wish ot general
> > >    purpose or ...
> > >
> > > Hiro
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:08:16 +0800
> > > "Edmon Chung" <edmon at registry.asia> wrote:
> > > > Hi Everyone,
> > > >
> > > > As proposed, please find attached slides attempting to describe
> > > > possible scenarios to approach Han coordination focusing on the
> > > > CGP/KGP disparities at this time.  This incorporates some
> > > > suggestions/comments from the CDNC meetings just concluded.
> > > >
> > > > I have not included KGP in the distribution, looking for feedback
> > > > from JGP and CGP first, or perhaps at our meeting.
> > > >
> > > > Edmon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cjk-coordination-2016-03-20.pptx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation
Size: 120692 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/chinesegp/attachments/20160320/268f172a/cjk-coordination-2016-03-20-0001.pptx>