[council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"

[Rosette, Kristina]

I also think we should talk about what, if anything, we should be doing as a Council to ensure that a WG Final Report doesn't get to us and we feel it's necessary to send it back to the WG.
________________________________
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 5:13 AM
To: Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu
Cc: 'council at gnso.icann.org'
Subject: Re: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"

This is clearly something we can discuss tomorrow.

As usual, we have not set an official agenda for our wrap-up so that we can look forward to some great discussion.

Thanks,

Stéphane



Le 22 juin 2011 à 11:05, <Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu<mailto:Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu>> a écrit :

Unfortunately, that brings us back to the discussion we had after whatever meeting it was, when we ended up re-drafting motions during our public meeting, and that didn't go down well either - both seem opposite ends of the spectrum (too much open discussion versus too little?). Maybe we should discuss this during the wrap-up session tomorrow.

Cheers
Mary


Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu<mailto:mary.wong at law.unh.edu>
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
From:   "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us<mailto:Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us>>
To:     "'tim at godaddy.com<mailto:'tim at godaddy.com>'" <tim at godaddy.com<mailto:tim at godaddy.com>>, "'adrian at ausregistry.com.au<mailto:'adrian at ausregistry.com.au>'" <adrian at ausregistry.com.au<mailto:adrian at ausregistry.com.au>>
CC:     "'council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:'council at gnso.icann.org>'" <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Date:   6/22/2011 4:59 AM
Subject:        Re: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
I think both Mikey and subsequently jumped the gun based on the debates over the weekend, which were just that....debates.

To post an article like Kieren has could have the unintended affect of stifling open debate during our sessions. I for one prefer open debate, but not if some are going to take that out of context.

We eventually got to the right place, but we needed to get there through debate and working through the issues. We should have been given the benefit of the doubt until we took final action.


Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
Vice President, Law & Policy
NeuStar, Inc.
Jeff.Neuman at neustar.biz<mailto:Jeff.Neuman at neustar.biz>



From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim at godaddy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 04:46 AM
To: adrian at ausregistry.com.au<mailto:adrian at ausregistry.com.au> <adrian at ausregistry.com.au<mailto:adrian at ausregistry.com.au>>
Cc: council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org> <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Subject: RE: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"

Of course, it is a one sided story. The Council changed nothing in the
report or recommendations. It only changed it's own motion. But, we all
know that. Too bad Kieren didn't bother to get more facts before jumping
the gun with his article. He used to be a bit more careful.


Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
> From: Adrian Kinderis
> Date: Wed, June 22, 2011 2:54 am
> To: GNSO Council List
>
> http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/06/22/gnso-council-vs-volunteer-model
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
>
>
>
>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110622/6de2a064/attachment.html>