[council] BC edits to the current proposed GNSO Council response to the call for Public Comment - ICANN Strategy Panels Draft Report
Jonathan Robinson
jrobinson at afilias.info
Mon Apr 28 21:09:33 UTC 2014
Thanks John.
I will incorporate these into the latest draft and circulate right away.
Jonathan
From: john at crediblecontext.com [mailto:john at crediblecontext.com]
Sent: 28 April 2014 21:50
To: council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] BC edits to the current proposed GNSO Council response to the call for Public Comment - ICANN Strategy Panels Draft Report
All,
I had sent this directly to the drafting team but at Jonathan's suggestion, I now send them to the full Council.
Cheers,
Berard
--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: BC edits to the current proposed GNSO Council response to the call for Public Comment - ICANN Strategy Panels Draft Report
From: john at crediblecontext.com
Date: 4/22/14 7:13 am
To: jrobinson at afilias.info, "Thomas Rickert" <rickert at anwaelte.de>
Cc: "Gabriela Szlak" <gabrielaszlak at gmail.com>
Jonathan, Thomas:
At this point, the BC has confirmed is opposition to offering a comment as a matter of policy, but has little quarrel with the thrust of the comment.
With this in mind, I offer the attached which redlines some of the language that can help make the point even as it reinforces the policy role of the Council.
Cheers,
Berard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20140428/8e3d4c93/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list