[Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report

[Joke Braeken]

All,

Many thanks for your contributions to the progress report.  May I kindly invite you to submit any additional comments there might be, no later than tomorrow (Friday 9 September), end of day?  On Monday 12 September a consolidated version of the progress report will be circulated to the WG mailing list.  The next WG call is scheduled for Monday 19 September at 21 UTC. A calendar invite has been sent out in the meanwhile.

Best regards,

Joke Braeken
ccNSO Policy Advisor
joke.braeken at icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken at icann.org>

Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO
Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/
http://ccnso.icann.org


From: <ctn-crosscom-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Annebeth Lange <annebeth.lange at uninett.no>
Date: Friday 2 September 2016 at 12:41
To: Timo Võhmar <timo.vohmar at internet.ee>, Heather Forrest <Heather.Forrest at acu.edu.au>
Cc: "ctn-crosscom at icann.org" <ctn-crosscom at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report

Dear all,

I have gone through the progress report after Heather’s answers to my questions. To make it easier to read I have accepted some of the more “linguistic” comments. Please see some new remarks from me.


Kind regards
Annebeth


From: <ctn-crosscom-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ctn-crosscom-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Timo Võhmar <timo.vohmar at internet.ee<mailto:timo.vohmar at internet.ee>>
Date: Thursday 1 September 2016 22:25
To: Heather Forrest <Heather.Forrest at acu.edu.au<mailto:Heather.Forrest at acu.edu.au>>
Cc: "ctn-crosscom at icann.org<mailto:ctn-crosscom at icann.org>" <ctn-crosscom at icann.org<mailto:ctn-crosscom at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report

Hi Heather

Just to clarify, my proposal was not to remove reference to PDP but to rephrase that part of the conclusion with two options - new CWG and PDP. Added my suggestion in the doc.

Best Regards,
Timo Võhmar


On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Heather Forrest <Heather.Forrest at acu.edu.au<mailto:Heather.Forrest at acu.edu.au>> wrote:

Dear all,



I have followed up in answering Annebeth's questions in the comments  and have no fundamental objections. On one point I believe we have duplicate text in two places so we need to decide where to put it. I've noted that in a reply comment. New version attached.



I do not agree with Timo's proposal at the end of the document to remove the reference in the recommendations section to the charter of the Subsequent Procedures PDP. This should not be a controversial statement, as the Charter is available and a public document.



Kind regards,



Heather Forrest

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ctn-crosscom/attachments/20160908/36c68d6a/attachment.html>