[client com] IANA Budget and ICANN Bylaws

Flanagan, Sharon sflanagan at sidley.com
Thu Apr 14 21:08:52 UTC 2016


Thanks. This answers all the open questions.

The beginning of the new wording for 22.4(b) regarding obligations of the PTI Board may fit better in the PTI articles, but we can work through that.

We will re-mark Section 22.4 and mark Annex F to address these additional comments.

Best regards,
Sharon



Sharon R. Flanagan
Sidley Austin LLP
SF tel: 415-772-1271
PA tel: 650-565-7008
Email: sflanagan at sidley.com


From: Grace Abuhamad [mailto:grace.abuhamad at icann.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 11:12 AM
To: Flanagan, Sharon; Client Committee <cwg-client at icann.org>; Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com>
Subject: Re: [client com] IANA Budget and ICANN Bylaws

Hi Sharon,

In sharing the final responses with you this morning, our understanding was that your questions on budget items were covered in the responses document, but to be sure, I have been asked to forward a letter that DT-O put together following their call yesterday.

Best,
Grace

--
Grace Abuhamad
Manager, Public Policy

ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
801 17th Street NW, Suite 400 | Washington, DC 20006
Direct: +1 202 249 7545 | Mobile: +1 310 200 7638

Interested in the IANA Stewardship Transition?
LEARN MORE<https://www.icann.org/stewardship-accountability>. STAY UPDATED<https://www.icann.org/stewardship-accountability#status>. FOLLOW<https://twitter.com/icann>. ENGAGE<https://www.icann.org/stewardship-accountability#involved>.

From: <cwg-client-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-client-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Sharon Flanagan <sflanagan at sidley.com<mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com>>
Date: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 5:27 PM
To: Client Committee <cwg-client at icann.org<mailto:cwg-client at icann.org>>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>>
Subject: [client com] IANA Budget and ICANN Bylaws

Dear All,

Attached is a chart that compares the CWG requirements on budget and the current draft ICANN bylaws.

Can the budget design team review and provide input so we can submit any required bylaws changes to ICANN?

We also understand that Design Team O will review the draft caretaker budgets that are annexes to the current draft Bylaws.

Thanks,
Sharon


SHARON R. FLANAGAN


SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street
Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
+1 415 772 1271
sflanagan at sidley.com<mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com>
www.sidley.com<http://www.sidley.com>
[SIDLEY]





****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20160414/13d66511/attachment.html>


More information about the Cwg-client mailing list