[client com] Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Thu Aug 11 17:42:30 UTC 2016


One further change, suggested by Sidley and in which I concur.  The
preamble should read:

 ​[the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, on behalf of
the names community]



On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>

> All,
> ​The CWG will move forward with ICANN as a possible signatory to the
> Community Agreement.  ​
> ​The preamble to the Community Agreement should delete the blank
> underscore before ("Names Community") and replace it with ​[the Internet
> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers].  To be clear, the square
> brackets should appear in the document.
> This should be accompanied by a footnote, which will have the following
> text:
> CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory
> to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community.  At the
> request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as
> the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names
> Community and ICANN has been included in this draft.  ICANN (or another
> counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by
> CWG-Stewardship.
> ​If you have any questions, please respond to this email.  Thanks!
> Greg​
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20160811/97d8d87b/attachment.html>

More information about the Cwg-client mailing list