[CWG-DT-Stewardship] FW: CWG to develop an IANA Stewardship Transition proposal on naming related functions and the work of the ICG

Grace Abuhamad grace.abuhamad at icann.org
Thu Sep 25 15:41:36 UTC 2014


Hi Avri, 

The mailing list for the CWG is not active yet. The list of members and
observers is available on the Wiki at
<https://community.icann.org/x/1QrxAg>

On 9/25/14 8:01 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Of course the CWG can't have questions as a WG until after it has met.
>But it was possible that the individual members might have had questions
>and that a public discussion would have made the meeting worthwhile.
>
>But I apologize for creating all this confusion over a meeting the
>already selected members of CWG do not want to have.  I don't quite
>understand, but I accept it.
>
>BTW, does the actual CWG have a list yet?
>
>avri
>
>
>On 25-Sep-14 04:03, Marika Konings wrote:
>> Hi Avri,
>> 
>> The letter notes that 'It follows that the CWG will not be in a position
>> to review the RFP or request any clarifications by the deadline of 24
>> September, but hopefully you are willing to accommodate any questions
>>that
>> the CWG may have following its formation'. My presumption is that the
>>RFP
>> and any possible questions / clarifications will be one of the first
>>items
>> the CWG may want to deal with, but we'll only know if there are any
>> questions once the CWG has had an opportunity to meet.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Marika
>> 
>> On 25/09/14 04:41, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24-Sep-14 18:47, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>>> Avri - are you aware of any questions we have for the ICG that
>>>> haven't already been addressed?  If so, could those be asked via
>>>> email?
>>>
>>> ok.
>>>
>>> I understand from the letter that Jonathan sent that we are telling
>>>them
>>> we won't be ready with the deliverable on schedule.  And I agree.
>>>
>>> Might have been worth talking over.
>>>
>>> Also assuming everyone already on the CWG is happy with their
>>> instructions, then I guess there is nothing to discuss with them.
>>>
>>> I am not arguing you/we must, I was just getting crossed signals, and
>>> figured I would check.  I have checked.
>>>
>>> avri
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
>>> CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
>CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5097 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-dt-stewardship/attachments/20140925/cd2b3e82/smime.p7s>


More information about the CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list