[DT-F] Design Team F kickoff

David Conrad david.conrad at icann.org
Wed Apr 8 00:41:10 UTC 2015


Jordan,

> The problem is the concentration of power/responsibility in what is currently
> a three-party process but which will soon be a two-party one (if the
> authorisation function is not replaced) with a single monolithic entity doing
> all this.

OK. To rephrase, would it be correct to say the requirement you'd like to
impose is that power/responsibility to modify/update the root zone is not
concentrated in a single entity (without getting into specifics as to how
that requirement is met to provide flexibility in coming up with a
solution)? 

Regards,
-drc



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-dtf/attachments/20150408/91cfb8c5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4673 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-dtf/attachments/20150408/91cfb8c5/smime.p7s>


More information about the cwg-dtf mailing list