[DT-F] URGENT: Several questions for DT-F

[Suzanne Woolf]

On Apr 17, 2015, at 4:42 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr at gmail.com> wrote:

> Leave it as is  noting we are still working towards a consensus position…

I'm fine with that. I think the larger community should have a chance to consider it. 



Suzanne

> 
> On 18 April 2015 at 06:31, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> At the time I hit SEND on the report, it was not quite clear how divided the group is. It is clear that at this point, there is no consensus for Suzanne to be worried about opposing.
> 
> I can readily agree to leave the recommendation as is with the large and blatant statement that we have not reach consensus on it, or delete it altogether, as we would have if the spit was as obvious at our last meeting as it is now.
> 
> Speak up if you care.
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> At 17/04/2015 03:18 PM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> 
> As I said, however, I'm not willing to stand against consensus on this. I'd be particularly happy to hear from some of the directly affected parties on it during the comment period.
> 
> 
> best,
> Suzanne
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cwg-dtf mailing list
> cwg-dtf at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dtf
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-dtf/attachments/20150418/152ec07f/attachment.html>