[DT-F] URGENT: Several questions for DT-F

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

Leave it as is  noting we are still working towards a consensus position...


*Cheryl Langdon-O**rr ...  *(CLO)

about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr
[image: Cheryl Langdon-Orr on about.me]
  <http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr>


On 18 April 2015 at 06:31, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> At the time I hit SEND on the report, it was not quite clear how divided
> the group is. It is clear that at this point, there is no consensus for
> Suzanne to be worried about opposing.
>
> I can readily agree to leave the recommendation as is with the large and
> blatant statement that we have not reach consensus on it, or delete it
> altogether, as we would have if the spit was as obvious at our last meeting
> as it is now.
>
> Speak up if you care.
>
> Alan
>
>
> At 17/04/2015 03:18 PM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
>
>  As I said, however, I'm not willing to stand against consensus on this.
>> I'd be particularly happy to hear from some of the directly affected
>> parties on it during the comment period.
>>
>>
>> best,
>> Suzanne
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cwg-dtf mailing list
> cwg-dtf at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dtf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-dtf/attachments/20150418/4bc7e651/attachment.html>