[DT-F] Revised section III.A.iii.a
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Wed Jun 3 02:57:24 UTC 2015
Thanks all. Great edits. Attached is are some further comments for
me. I will create a final version, do one more proof-read, and send to the CWG.
Alan
At 02/06/2015 09:17 PM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Thanks Alan for the edits and the prodding.
>
>I'm comfortable with this version. I like David's edit that would
>operationalize the threshold for consideration of an issue by the
>standing committee, but the committee could adopt that standard for
>itself if we don't direct them to.
>
>We face the usual challenges with populating the standing committee,
>and the membership may still need tinkering, e.g. I'm not sure the
>ASO is interested or necessary, but I'm not worried about it-- the
>workload is low enough, the mandate narrow enough, and the committee
>obviously useful enough, that it should be easy to get closure on a
>reasonable set of commitments.
>
>
>best,
>Suzanne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DT-F_June-v02 with Gomes input-drc-ag.docx
Type: application/msword
Size: 29893 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-dtf/attachments/20150602/782a0446/DT-F_June-v02withGomesinput-drc-ag-0001.docx>
More information about the cwg-dtf
mailing list