[CWG-RFP3] Can a stepped evolution of the IANA role be envisioned?

[Greg Shatan]

All:

I am splitting Robert Guerra's questions into two separate threads.  His
first question:



*For options #1 & 2- Can a  stepped evolution of the IANA role be
envisioned? If so, the NTIA handover could be seen as the beginning of a
process....*.

Comments and discussion?

Greg



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
Date: Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: [CWG-RFP3] Coordination of Subgroup 3
To: RFP3 <cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>


 Greg,

In regards to one of your questions - might I suggest  an additional
questions to consider:

For options #1 & 2

- Can a  stepped evolution of the IANA role be envisioned? If so, the NTIA
handover could be seen as the beginning of a process...

For  option #2.

- Is there is a  jurisdiction that ICANN has (or can obtain) legal status
might be more suitable to use to create IANA as a subsidiary. Such an
option might allow for the link to be a subsidiary of ICANN, but sever the
legal link to the US. A negative, of course, would be moving the function
and existing staff to a new part of the world.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20141103/f362e310/attachment.html>