[CWG-RFP3] Can a stepped evolution of the IANA role be envisioned?

[Burr, Becky]

But the question is about evolution of the IANA role, no?  What would its role be when the evolution is done?

J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  / becky.burr at neustar.biz<mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> / www.neustar.biz

From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, November 3, 2014 at 12:18 PM
To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>>
Cc: RFP3 <cwg-rfp3 at icann.org<mailto:cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [CWG-RFP3] Can a stepped evolution of the IANA role be envisioned?

Speaking here as a non-member of subgroup 3 (apologies if this is not the right time as i don't have an i idea of when it will be)

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>> wrote:
All:

I am splitting Robert Guerra's questions into two separate threads.  His first question:

For options #1 & 2

- Can a  stepped evolution of the IANA role be envisioned? If so, the NTIA handover could be seen as the beginning of a process.....

Sure that is what i presume is happening right now; NTIA withdrawal of its oversight (not sure hand-over is the word to use) and then the continued implementation of the contract OR whatever mechanism that gets replaced with NTIA kicks in. Then other implementation like the ICANN accountability continues...so Yes i think its already a "step by step" process.

Cheers!
Comments and discussion?

Greg



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org<mailto:rguerra at privaterra.org>>
Date: Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: [CWG-RFP3] Coordination of Subgroup 3
To: RFP3 <cwg-rfp3 at icann.org<mailto:cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>>


 Greg,

In regards to one of your questions - might I suggest  an additional questions to consider:

For options #1 & 2

- Can a  stepped evolution of the IANA role be envisioned? If so, the NTIA handover could be seen as the beginning of a process...

For  option #2.

- Is there is a  jurisdiction that ICANN has (or can obtain) legal status might be more suitable to use to create IANA as a subsidiary. Such an option might allow for the link to be a subsidiary of ICANN, but sever the legal link to the US. A negative, of course, would be moving the function and existing staff to a new part of the world.


_______________________________________________
Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org<mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_cwg-2Drfp3&d=AAMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=Yc5TPj8DZwOSVVYgCtos5mtURS7xteOglN01KXppTYo&s=WLM7P4vDVLHI6WsQeHaCUax-_STjnvpW2Z3DtrrNBkQ&e=>




--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
web:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.fuoye.edu.ng&d=AAMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=Yc5TPj8DZwOSVVYgCtos5mtURS7xteOglN01KXppTYo&s=gGhyFcGfi_RK669GKK8Nk2hfQeVKSXmUEkmPSrmzKnc&e=>
Mobile: +2348035233535
alt email:<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__goog-5F1872880453&d=AAMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=Yc5TPj8DZwOSVVYgCtos5mtURS7xteOglN01KXppTYo&s=4N3DFRi_3qqz70-ArBMmHzL5mrXkg_5iLGxRi_rLiwQ&e=>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng<mailto:seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>

The key to understanding is humility - my view !

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20141103/9a446a27/attachment-0001.html>