[CWG-RFP3] Can a stepped evolution of the IANA role be envisioned?

[Paul M Kane]

 From a ccTLD Manager perspective - I don't think an evolutionary 
process of centralising authority at ICANN is desirable.

Currently ccTLD Registries are decentralised, empowering diversity to 
best serve their customer's needs.  ccTLD Registries are accountable to 
their local community, (have Policy development process that accommodate 
local culture, legal systems and operating environments) and are 
responsible for their entries in the IANA and Root Servers - and long 
may that continue.

For gTLDs - I agree this may be the first step.....

Best

Paul

Dwi Elfrida Martina wrote:
> H again,
>
> I am Dwi Elfrida from Indonesia. Absolutely the handover of IANA 
> stewardship from NTIA to ICANN is only the beginning of the process. 
> Since the transition issue was raised up, I didn't see it only an 
> activity to change the steward's names on the paper or website, but 
> the main issue is to move the IANA stewardship into 
> multistakeholders's hands which all of us might agree that 
> multistakeholders management is not easy peasy thing, it might sound 
> juicy but very complicated as well. The NTIA handover is just the 
> beginning, because when the ICANN agree to accept stewardship of IANA, 
> the ICANN whose multistakeholeder management has to take 
> responsibility over the budget for operational expenses, legal issues, 
> and the most important is to bring the vision of IANA transition to 
> come true.  I assume that equality of IP Addresses distribution and 
> net security, neutrality, are concerned as goals of IANA transition.
>
> Regards,,
>
> Dwi
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com 
> <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Boxbe <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> Greg Shatan
>     (gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>) is not
>     on your Guest List
>     <https://www.boxbe.com/approved-list?tc_serial=19182773758&tc_rand=651671571&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_MWTP&utm_content=001&token=gZc4ycfJla7w6fS0nywkd9u81j8HeOCfyGrQL4tcRJ3%2F%2Fp71Kl51KncVsFJSlXqJ&key=d9oree3aHTM6Zrp76BQmdF08R8grguLniLuMVCA4AVk%3D>
>     | Approve sender
>     <https://www.boxbe.com/anno?tc_serial=19182773758&tc_rand=651671571&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_MWTP&utm_content=001&token=gZc4ycfJla7w6fS0nywkd9u81j8HeOCfyGrQL4tcRJ3%2F%2Fp71Kl51KncVsFJSlXqJ&key=d9oree3aHTM6Zrp76BQmdF08R8grguLniLuMVCA4AVk%3D>
>     | Approve domain
>     <https://www.boxbe.com/anno?tc_serial=19182773758&tc_rand=651671571&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_MWTP&utm_content=001&dom&token=gZc4ycfJla7w6fS0nywkd9u81j8HeOCfyGrQL4tcRJ3%2F%2Fp71Kl51KncVsFJSlXqJ&key=d9oree3aHTM6Zrp76BQmdF08R8grguLniLuMVCA4AVk%3D>
>
>
>     All:
>
>     I am splitting Robert Guerra's questions into two separate
>     threads.  His first question:
>
>     *For options #1 & 2
>
>     - Can a  stepped evolution of the IANA role be envisioned? If so,
>     the NTIA handover could be seen as the beginning of a process....*.
>
>     Comments and discussion?
>
>     Greg
>
>
>
>     ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>     From: *Robert Guerra* <rguerra at privaterra.org
>     <mailto:rguerra at privaterra.org>>
>     Date: Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:01 AM
>     Subject: Re: [CWG-RFP3] Coordination of Subgroup 3
>     To: RFP3 <cwg-rfp3 at icann.org <mailto:cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>>
>
>
>      Greg,
>
>     In regards to one of your questions - might I suggest  an
>     additional questions to consider:
>
>     For options #1 & 2
>
>     - Can a  stepped evolution of the IANA role be envisioned? If so,
>     the NTIA handover could be seen as the beginning of a process...
>
>     For  option #2.
>
>     - Is there is a  jurisdiction that ICANN has (or can obtain) legal
>     status might be more suitable to use to create IANA as a
>     subsidiary. Such an option might allow for the link to be a
>     subsidiary of ICANN, but sever the legal link to the US. A
>     negative, of course, would be moving the function and existing
>     staff to a new part of the world.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>     Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org <mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Dwi Elfrida MS
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>