[CWG-RFP3] Can a stepped evolution of the IANA role be envisioned?

Thu Nov 6 13:51:50 UTC 2014

Will be important for all the process have this two perspective in equilibrium (ccTLDs vs gTLDs) in special related with local legislation and policies.

Erick

> El 6/11/2014, a las 2:28, Paul M Kane <Paul.Kane at icb.co.uk> escribió:
> 
> From a ccTLD Manager perspective - I don't think an evolutionary process of centralising authority at ICANN is desirable.
> 
> Currently ccTLD Registries are decentralised, empowering diversity to best serve their customer's needs.  ccTLD Registries are accountable to their local community, (have Policy development process that accommodate local culture, legal systems and operating environments) and are responsible for their entries in the IANA and Root Servers - and long may that continue.
> 
> For gTLDs - I agree this may be the first step.....
> 
> Best
> 
> Paul
> 
> Dwi Elfrida Martina wrote:
>> H again,
>> 
>> I am Dwi Elfrida from Indonesia. Absolutely the handover of IANA stewardship from NTIA to ICANN is only the beginning of the process. Since the transition issue was raised up, I didn't see it only an activity to change the steward's names on the paper or website, but the main issue is to move the IANA stewardship into multistakeholders's hands which all of us might agree that multistakeholders management is not easy peasy thing, it might sound juicy but very complicated as well. The NTIA handover is just the beginning, because when the ICANN agree to accept stewardship of IANA, the ICANN whose multistakeholeder management has to take responsibility over the budget for operational expenses, legal issues, and the most important is to bring the vision of IANA transition to come true.  I assume that equality of IP Addresses distribution and net security, neutrality, are concerned as goals of IANA transition.
>> 
>> Regards,,
>> 
>> Dwi
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>    Boxbe <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> Greg Shatan
>>    (gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>) is not
>>    on your Guest List
>>    <https://www.boxbe.com/approved-list?tc_serial=19182773758&tc_rand=651671571&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_MWTP&utm_content=001&token=gZc4ycfJla7w6fS0nywkd9u81j8HeOCfyGrQL4tcRJ3%2F%2Fp71Kl51KncVsFJSlXqJ&key=d9oree3aHTM6Zrp76BQmdF08R8grguLniLuMVCA4AVk%3D>
>>    | Approve sender
>>    <https://www.boxbe.com/anno?tc_serial=19182773758&tc_rand=651671571&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_MWTP&utm_content=001&token=gZc4ycfJla7w6fS0nywkd9u81j8HeOCfyGrQL4tcRJ3%2F%2Fp71Kl51KncVsFJSlXqJ&key=d9oree3aHTM6Zrp76BQmdF08R8grguLniLuMVCA4AVk%3D>
>>    | Approve domain
>>    <https://www.boxbe.com/anno?tc_serial=19182773758&tc_rand=651671571&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_MWTP&utm_content=001&dom&token=gZc4ycfJla7w6fS0nywkd9u81j8HeOCfyGrQL4tcRJ3%2F%2Fp71Kl51KncVsFJSlXqJ&key=d9oree3aHTM6Zrp76BQmdF08R8grguLniLuMVCA4AVk%3D>
>> 
>> 
>>    All:
>> 
>>    I am splitting Robert Guerra's questions into two separate
>>    threads.  His first question:
>> 
>>    *For options #1 & 2
>> 
>>    - Can a  stepped evolution of the IANA role be envisioned? If so,
>>    the NTIA handover could be seen as the beginning of a process....*.
>> 
>>    Comments and discussion?
>> 
>>    Greg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>    From: *Robert Guerra* <rguerra at privaterra.org
>>    <mailto:rguerra at privaterra.org>>
>>    Date: Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:01 AM
>>    Subject: Re: [CWG-RFP3] Coordination of Subgroup 3
>>    To: RFP3 <cwg-rfp3 at icann.org <mailto:cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>>
>> 
>> 
>>     Greg,
>> 
>>    In regards to one of your questions - might I suggest  an
>>    additional questions to consider:
>> 
>>    For options #1 & 2
>> 
>>    - Can a  stepped evolution of the IANA role be envisioned? If so,
>>    the NTIA handover could be seen as the beginning of a process...
>> 
>>    For  option #2.
>> 
>>    - Is there is a  jurisdiction that ICANN has (or can obtain) legal
>>    status might be more suitable to use to create IANA as a
>>    subsidiary. Such an option might allow for the link to be a
>>    subsidiary of ICANN, but sever the legal link to the US. A
>>    negative, of course, would be moving the function and existing
>>    staff to a new part of the world.
>> 
>> 
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>>    Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org <mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
>>    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dwi Elfrida MS
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>>   
> _______________________________________________
> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3

_________________________________________________________________
Erick Iriarte
Área de Derecho de Nuevas Tecnologias

IRIARTE & ASOCIADOS
Dirección: Miró Quesada 191, of. 510, Lima 01, Perú
Telefax: (+511) 2035400
Sitio web: iriartelaw.com
Twitter: @ialaw
Facebook: facebook.com/ialaw

Por favor antes de imprimir piense en nuestro medio ambiente, una hoja puede hacer la diferencia en un bosque.

Please, before printing, think of our environment, a leaf can make a difference in a forest.

Declaracion de Confidencialidad
El contenido de este mensaje de correo electronico y de sus archivos adjuntos esta(n) dirigido(s) exclusivamente a el(los) destinatario(s) del mismo.  Adicionalmente, este mensaje y su contenido pueden ser privilegiados y estar cubiertos por la reserva profesional entre abogado y cliente.  Si usted no es el destinatario indicado, o si este mensaje le ha sido enviado por error, queda advertido en el sentido de no leer, divulgar, reproducir, distribuir, diseminar o utilizar este mensaje en forma alguna.  La entrega de este mensaje a cualquier persona diferente del(de los) destinatario(s) a quien(es) se ha dirigido no constituye una renuncia de privilegios o confidencialidad.  Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por favor advierta al remitente mediante correo de respuesta; adicionalmente le  solicitamos que inmediatamente proceda a suprimir este mensaje y sus archivos adjuntos, si los hubiere.

Statement of Confidentiality
The contents of this e-mail message and its attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) hereof.  In addition, this e-mail transmission may be confidential and it may be subject to privilege protecting communications between attorneys or solicitors and their clients.  If you are not the named addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are directed not to read, disclose, reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this e-mail.  Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege or confidentiality.  If you have received this transmission in error, please alert the sender by reply e-mail; we also request that you immediately delete this message and its attachments, if any. Please, before printing, think of our environment, a leaf can make a difference in a forest.