[CWG-RFP3] Proposed Agenda for Wednesday 12 November Meeting

[Greg Shatan]

All:

For easy comparison of the Strawman Proposals, I attach a "Strawman Matrix."

Greg

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Guru Acharya <gurcharya at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
> This is excellent work.
>
> The three straw-mans are a good starting point for discussion.
>
> Proposal 1 and 2 look well structured for discussion, and capture much of
> the discussion on this list till date.
>
> In contrast, I think Proposal 3 appears to be an outlier. In Proposal 3, I
> do not understand the need to create a new legal entity for the oversight
> body (PROSI). Since Proposal 3 suggests the creation of a new IANA entity,
> the SLA could simply be between ICANN and the new IANA entity. There is no
> need for creation of a new legal entity for the oversight body. The current
> bulkiness of Proposal 3 makes it the first candidate for rejection.
>
> Regards,
> Guru
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> All:
>>
>> In the course of preparing for tomorrow's call, including discussions
>> with the Co-Chairs of the CWG and other subgroup leads, it was decided that
>> a preferred course of action would be to prepare three "Strawman Proposals"
>> rather than a single "Framework Document" with multiple variables.  These
>> three Strawman Proposals are attached.  The proposals are organized on a
>> consistent outline, largely taken from the "Variables" document.  This will
>> allow us to consider the proposals both "vertically" and "horizontally"
>> (i.e., across the documents), and to swap sections as we move toward the
>> ultimate deliverable of a single proposal.  The proposals are intended to
>> capture most of the major alternatives discussed on this list, the CWG
>> list, and in our calls, as well as in other documents circulated in the
>> community.  However, if a particular alternative has not been captured in
>> any proposal, that does not mean that it is "dead" or even disfavored.
>> Similarly, I expect there will be additional issues to be considered in any
>> proposal, and these should be captured as well, either on the call or
>> thereafter.
>>
>> I apologize for the lateness of the hour; I hope you will see that the
>> alternatives are not unfamiliar, even if they are now repackaged in
>> proposal form.  In our call tomorrow morning, I would like to review and
>> work through these proposals in lieu of items 2 and 3 of the agenda.  In
>> the course of that review, we should aim to consider pro's and con's, which
>> will be added to a document during our call, and then posted or circulated
>> for further editing.  I expect that the Strawman Proposals will be
>> similarly posted or circulated.
>>
>> I look forward to our call.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Greg
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Grace Abuhamad <
>> grace.abuhamad at icann.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Here is the proposed agenda for the RFP3 subgroup meeting on Wednesday:
>>>
>>>    1. Welcome and Roll Call
>>>    2. Review of Variables Document (link here
>>>    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/10PIySH4OEdebff1lU7foynDe8S3PZEvjG2W_UCpJamM/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>    )
>>>    3. Review of Framework Document (to be circulated before call)
>>>    4. Live-Editing of Pros and Cons Document (to be circulated before
>>>    call)
>>>    5. Thoughts on this sub-group on how best to use time in Frankfurt
>>>    6. Assignments for fleshing out parts of Framework Document
>>>    7. AOB
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Grace
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20141112/2daea2c9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Strawman Matrix.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 28262 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20141112/2daea2c9/StrawmanMatrix-0001.docx>