[CWG-RFP3] Proposed Redline to Strawman 1

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I added a few comment to Kurt's version.

I basically had difficulty with several aspects of it.
- the unistakeholder approach
- the lack of a credible separability mechanism for removing the
function to another contractor if needed
- the reliance on changes to the bylaws that could be undone

thanks

avri


On 15-Nov-14 14:01, kurt at kjpritz.com wrote:
> Hi Stephanie:
>
> This is very good work and is organized in a way and is in enough detail to use 
> as a substantive discussion reference. I've made several comments that are 
> intended as constructive and also intended to flesh out the proposal.
>
> I made the comments to this proposal rather than the spreadsheet containing all 
> four proposals but they would apply to others as well. (I apologize to whomever 
> is responsible for taking all these comments starting on Monday to collate.)
>
> Regards,
>
> Kurt
>
>
>     -------- Original Message --------
>     Subject: [CWG-RFP3] Proposed Redline to Strawman 1
>     From: "Duchesneau, Stephanie" <Stephanie.Duchesneau at neustar.us
>     <mailto:Stephanie.Duchesneau at neustar.us>>
>     Date: Fri, November 14, 2014 1:50 pm
>     To: "'Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org <mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>'" <Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
>     <mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>>
>
>     Hi All,
>     Please find attached a redline, suggesting changes and additions to Greg’s
>     Strawman 1 model. The strawman reflects input from several gTLD registry
>     representatives to this group. As the redline is fairly heavy, I have
>     incorporated a clean version as well as a version that tracks all changes
>     made to the original version that Greg provided. The draft also includes
>     some comments on a few of the areas that will require further thought and
>     development.
>     I will also work to reflect these recommendations in the Google Docs that
>     compares the strawmen. We encourage members of this group to review this
>     document and provide any feedback on the updated strawman.
>     Best.
>     Stephanie
>     *Stephanie Duchesneau**
>     **Neustar, Inc. / *Public Policy Manager
>     1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 4^th Floor, Washington, DC 20006
>     *Office:***+1.202.533.2623 *Mobile: *+1.703.731.2040*Fax:
>     *+1.202.533.2623*/*www.neustar.biz <http://www.neustar.biz/>
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use
>     of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
>     privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
>     received this email message in error and any review, dissemination,
>     distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
>     received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
>     delete the original message.
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     _______________________________________________
>     Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>     Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org <mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CWG RFP3 Strawman_SD Redline (kp-edits)+ad.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 37643 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20141115/85d0319a/CWGRFP3Strawman_SDRedlinekp-editsad-0001.docx>