[CWG-RFP3] Seperabilty

[WUKnoben]

See below in blue



Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich



From: Avri Doria 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 2:04 PM
To: cwg-rfp3 at icann.org 
Subject: Re: [CWG-RFP3] Seperabilty


On 25-Nov-14 14:42, Guru Acharya wrote:

1) That there is no need for an RFP in September 2015 when the current
contract term ends.
Note, I also do not think that there is the need for an RFP in 2015.  
I do not think that would contribute to stability or quality of performance.


2) That there is no need for an RFP that is periodic.

While I do believe there is a need to a periodic one.  
I think the first can be 3-9 years hence. 
9 seems long, 3 might be short.
6 might be in  compromise range.

and 7 is the max duration of the NTIA contract, including extensions. It could be shorter if an extension is not granted. 

avri



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20141125/ad2a6917/attachment.html>