[CWG-RFP3] Seperabilty

[Avri Doria]

On 25-Nov-14 14:42, Guru Acharya wrote:
> 1) That there is no need for an RFP in September 2015 when the current
> contract term ends.

Note, I also do not think that there is the need for an RFP in 2015. 
I do not think that would contribute to stability or quality of performance.

> 2) That there is no need for an RFP that is periodic.

While I do believe there is a need to a periodic one. 
I think the first can be 3-9 years hence.
9 seems long, 3 might be short.
6 might be in  compromise range.

avri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20141125/d764bb96/attachment.html>