[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - version V3.3
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Tue Apr 21 09:31:18 UTC 2015
The discussion about INT last night made me have an close look at the INT pargraph at this version.
I do notice that
a) since .INT is already delegated, RFC 6761 (Special-Use Names)
doesn't really play any roll here so there is no need to mention
it;
b) likewise, there is no need to mention for what purose the eligible
registrant might use it;
c) policy for INT is actually described in 1951 and further restricted
to just the international organisations (See iana.org for the
eligiblity rules. The last infrastructural database (ip6.int) was
removed per RFC 4152 in 2005.
Therefore I propose the following rewrite of section e, page 36 (Final
Clean draft V3 in pdf).
Regards,
jaap
----
e) Redelegation and Operation of the .INT TLD (NTIA IANA Functions
Contract: C.2.9.4)
* Description of the function: Historically, the policy for INT is
described in IETF RFC 1591. The policy allowed registration for
both international organisations and for use for international
databases for infrastructure use. Specifically, the policy for INT
related to international databases for infrastructure use was
determined by the IETF. RFC 3172 recommended that such uses move
under ARPA, and the only then-extant use of INT for such
infrastructure (the IPv6 reverse mapping tree) was in fact moved
under ARPA; all subsequent infrastructure uses have been under
ARPA. Since this change, it is only possible for an international
treaty organizations to register domain names under INT for use for
the organization itself.
* Customers of the function: Eligible registrants for registration in
.INT (http://www.iana.org/domains/int/policy).
* What registries are involved in providing the function: Root Zone
database, Root Zone WHOIS, .INT Zone database, .INT WHOIS database.
* Overlaps or interdependencies: Historically policy has partially
been determined by IETF, however per RFC 3172, .INT is no longer
used for international databases for infrastructure use, instead
ARPA TLD is used for this.
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list