[CWG-Stewardship] On draft reply to SSAC

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Wed Aug 5 17:50:50 UTC 2015


Hi,

In the item 3.b. question 2 draft response, it isn't clear to me how
the first sentence responds to the question.  It seems to me that the
answer can start with "Since the standing committee makes
recommendations…," continuing to the end.  (This has the happy
consequence also of removing the proposed make up of the committee
from consideration.  If any of those bodies were to decline the
invitation to participate that premise would be weaker.  But if we can
just discard the premise in the argument without harm, then we might
as well do so.)

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list