[CWG-Stewardship] Client Committee Update

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond]

Dear Kieren,

On 25/02/2015 00:56, Kieren McCarthy wrote:
> > How do we balance functionality and timely efficiency with allowing
> full openness to all?
>
>
> I don't see many others asking to join this committee so I'm not sure
> this question is valid.
>

The ALAC asked to have at least one of its representatives on the
Committee and this was refused.
We abided by this decision from the Chairs because ultimately:
1. we did not want to be a factor that was going to slow down the
process. The Client Committee needs to act swiftly & professionally with
the Legal Advice
2. we wish to show trust in the current Client Committee of 4 people.

I emphasize point 2 in particular. Whilst transparency is very
important, "trust" is important too.

Kind regards,

Olivier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150225/5d01b414/attachment.html>