[CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS

Maarten Simon maarten.simon at sidn.nl
Fri Jan 9 13:33:52 UTC 2015

Hi Allan,

I ‘volunteer’ and agree with your suggestions for the work to be done.


From: Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca<mailto:allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>>
Date: Friday 9 January 2015 00:46
To: Christopher Wilkinson <lists at christopherwilkinson.eu<mailto:lists at christopherwilkinson.eu>>, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>>
Cc: "cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS

Chris – thanks for volunteering.  We all know that time is very tight so I want to outline how I think we could best optimize our time and energy.

As you know there are three main components to the current CWG proposal for the IANA functions: Contract Co; CSC and the MRT, setting the IAP aside, at least for the moment.  I propose that we focus on a variant of the CWG option which does not have, at least immediately, a ‘Contract Co’, but rather relies on some set of ‘triggers’ to create the separation of the IANA function from ICANN.  My hope is that we can develop a single proposal for discussion purposes and in this fashion, catch up to the work that has already been done on the full CWG proposal.  With such a focus on ‘no Contract Co’ we may also be able to set aside, again, at least for the moment, the CSC and the MRT as I believe there is a high degree of consensus that the functions that these two entities would perform are needed, that is operational oversight and periodic review respectively.

This may seem to be a daunting task, but I would remind you that the core of the CWG proposal ran to only just 7 pages in the December 1 proposal.  I think that together we can put something credible together in a reasonable amount of time.

It would be very helpful if the communities and organizations who had significant concerns with Contract Co and who also sought the development of such a proposal could actively participate as I fear it would lack credibility without them.  I am speaking in particular of auDA, SIDN, Google and ALAC.  If I have missed centring anyone out, you are still welcome to volunteer!


From: Christopher Wilkinson [mailto:lists at christopherwilkinson.eu]
Sent: January-08-15 5:03 PM
To: Jonathan Robinson; Allan MacGillivray
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS
Importance: High

Good evening: In the light of my pervious comments, I would be prepared to volunteer for this function.



On 08 Jan 2015, at 17:42, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>> wrote:



Please note this urgent call for volunteers for a sub-group of RFP3.

The sub-group is  required to work together to further develop a variant proposal for the CWG which takes account of proposals and comments received by the CWG, particularly as they relate to a so-called “internal to ICANN” option or variant to the original draft proposal of the CWG.

Allan Mc Gillivray has offered to assist with co-ordination of the group and it will need a committed team to work with Allan in short order to make the requisite progress.


CWG Co-chair

CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150109/96e9f2b3/attachment.html>

More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list