[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript RFP 4 28 January 14:00 UTC

[Greg Shatan]

Wasn't there a specific action item to try and meet with IANA staff (Elise
Gerich, etc.)?

Greg

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Call on 22 January
> are available here:
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51416935
> *Actions*
>
> *Action SIVA: review document CCWG
> and merge with documents of this group. *
>
> *Action Siva:
>  Group /merge the tests/scenario's identified in similar way as WA 4 CCWG list.*
>
> ·       *Need to check whether scenario relevant for
> transition.Include in document , with qualification, important , normal, not relevant in this context.*
>
>
> *Action all: request if participants see a need to meet, if so , then use Doodle poll to set time.*
>
> ·
> *Question: is there need for meeting before Singapore by this group? Response need on the list by Friday 30 January 2015. 16.00 UTC.*
>
> *Action
> staff : try to arrange meeting with BRC to seek information from them on  risks already identified,
> and possibly relevant for RFP 4 group*
> *Notes*
>
> *RFP 4 group call # 6*
>
> *CWG Stewardship Transition 28 January 2015, 14.00-16.00 UTC*
>
> *0. welcome/introduction.*
>
> Siva & Seun audio only
>
> Assess work has been done to date, get updates, plan moving forward
>
> *1. review of tasks/minutes from last call*
>
> ·       Update Siva on document on stress document and updates received:
>
> ·
> To date no participation on stress test document. Members are requested to have alook at the document.
>
> *2. review/updates from sub-workings groups on  timeline(s), stress tests*
>
> ·
> CCWG Accountability has been doing work on stress test and scenario's/ Suggestion to look at the work of CCWG Accountability
>
> ·
> OCL: Notes, potential of duplicating work.. Notes a limited number of scenarios, compared with work of the CWG RFP 4.
>
>
>
> *Action SIVA: review document and merge with documents of this group. *
>
>
> Include in document , with qualification, important , normal, not relevant in this context.
>
> Based on this document, group to design a survey.
>
>
>
>
> Note this group: Larry Strickling asked some specific questions to CWG, and one in particlur to this group.
>
> See:*: *
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/speechtestimony/2015/remarks-assistant-secretary-strickling-state-net-conference-1272015
>
>
>
>
> Jaap: notes difference made between test for transition and those related to accountability. Further Siva list needs to be trimmed to proper risks.. Currently list is open ended..
>
>
>
>
> *Action Siva: Group /merge the tests/scenario's identified in similar way as WA 4 CCWG list. Need to check if relevant for transition.*
>
>
> Question: what does it mean if a test fails? What are the metrics if doing the test/benchmark?
>
> No clear answer. This is testing organization.
>
> Suggestion: check what is meant with testing. Is checking impact on
>
>
>
>
> Action Staff: RFP 4 wants to have a meeting with staff/and or NTIA around meaning of tests
>
>
>
> Going forward
>
> No further comments on Larry Strickling statement
>
>
> Greg: Check what are causes ans outcomes. tests should be focused on IANA specific risks.
>
> OCL: Board Risk Framework Committee,(BRC) is working on list of contingencies. This list is most likely not publicly
> available.  Assumption the list of scenario's is on list.
>
> *Action
> staff : try to arrange meeting with BRC to seek information from them on  risks already identified,
> and possibly relevant for RFP 4 group*
>
>
>
> *Update Timeline, transition time line *
>
>
> OCL: Time line was geared against one proposal , however it this is now changing given RFP 3b now will look at two alternatives.
>
>
>
> *Update RFP 3b AM*
>
>
> RFP 3b contributes to document of CWG in preparation Singapore. The internal Option, will include two variants
>
> "Trust" option
>
> "Bylaw option"
>
>
>
>
> RFP 3 update: moving forward on fleshing out Contract Co option. Latest focus on structural details and functions
>
> As structural details are build out, more details could
> be included in set risks
>
>
>
> * 3. improvements to working methods*
>
>
> Looking for better coordination with other groups within CWG and with WA 4 of CCWG.
>
> Need to avoid silo-ed work.
>
> Question: what is best way to evolve work of this group, in conjunction with evolution of the
> different models.
>
> How could coordination and collaboration with others could be improve
>
> ·
> GS: Iterative process between RFP 3 and RFP 4. Would  be helpful for RFP 3 to review work of RFP 4 to inform their work: apply stress test while models are developed.
>
> ·
> Vice versa also applies.  Update stress test, when tests are applied to models.
>
> ·
> Actively compare risk scenario's developed by different groups: BRC, CCWG, CWG and others
>
> ·
> RG: To assist Feed-back of this group to RFP 3, what are changes going forward.
>
> ·       OCL:  Raises concern
> that RFP 3b has reached standstill until Singapore awaiting Legal consideration. Risk of moving forward by this, without a
> linkage.
>
> ·       GS: notes legal advice is limited,  should
> not be preclude to work in parallel on developing tests.
>
> ·
> Try to work in parallel, and improve coordination to avoid wasting efforts.
>
>
>
> * 4. Planning for ICANN Singapore meeting*
>
>    - Possible meetings with others. Suggestion to be send to list
>    -
>    *Action all: request if participants see a need to meet, if so , then use Doodle poll to set time.*
>    -
>    *Question: is there need for meeting before Singapore by this group? Response need on the list by Friday 30 January 2015. 16.00 UTC.*
>
> * 5. Other items*
>
> No comments
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150128/0149e044/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150128/0149e044/image001-0001.gif>