[CWG-Stewardship] Support for PTI and PTI board composition in the public comments
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Thu May 28 08:57:36 UTC 2015
(Milton)
FAVOR: 31
OPPOSE: 10
Not explicitly addressed: 6
(Kieren)
> One key element from that: the actual numbers (rather than general sense
> and who) are not very useful because the sample is too small - the level of
> response is not there to draw conclusions beyond areas of agreement or
> disagreement.
Yes, it is hard to quantify the reactions. An other observation is
that 41 Responses is less then the (currently) 133 listed
participants.
jaap
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list