[CWG-Stewardship] Support for PTI and PTI board composition in the public comments

Jaap Akkerhuis jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Thu May 28 08:57:36 UTC 2015


(Milton)

   FAVOR: 31

   OPPOSE: 10

   Not explicitly addressed: 6

(Kieren)

 > One key element from that: the actual numbers (rather than general sense
 > and who) are not very useful because the sample is too small - the level of
 >  response is not there to draw conclusions beyond areas of agreement or
 > disagreement.

Yes, it is hard to quantify the reactions. An other observation is
that 41 Responses is less then the (currently) 133 listed
participants.


	jaap



More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list