[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA #54 - 29 May (Session 5)

[Brenda Brewer]

Dear all, 

 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA High Intensity Meeting, Session 5 - 29 May
are available here:  https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/IANA+CWG+Meeting+%2354

 

Kind regards,

Brenda

 


Action Items


Action (Sidley): consider another term for 'inside'/'outside' Board

Action (Stephanie) -- will do an overview of draft to make sure clarification/scope for naming
functions is clear. 


Notes


Overall Timeline / Milestones

*        2 June CWG-Stewardship meeting

*        4 June CWG-Stewardship meeting - review final proposal (sign-off?)

*        8 June - submission to SO/ACs

*        9 June CWG-Stewardship meeting - Next steps, communication, other issues

*        W/C 8 June - Communication Work - Webinars on 11 June?

*        21-25 June -- ICANN 53 in Buenos Aires

Current schedule for rest of meetings: 

*        Meeting #55 (14h00 to 16h00 UTC) - Remaining open issues including implementation and
timescales

Notes: 

*	Focus now on DC
*	The function of the PTI Board is to operate the subsidiary to meet, at minimum, the
statutorily requirements for the subsidiary. In addition the PTI 
Board will have to ensure that the PTI as the subsidiary performs to meet the conditions of the
contract which will encapsulate all the SLEs and 
other requirements that PTI is expected to meet.
*	The provisional construct of the PTI Board would be a range of 3-5 people with, for example,
the President of GDD, CTO, IANA Managing 
Director, and two additional directors. The CWG will consider making recommendations as to the skill
set of PTI Board directors. 
*	A suggestion, consistent with the provisional construct, which received some traction is as
follows: ICANN Board not CEO selects the 3 members 
of the PTI board from among ICANN employees with advice and consent of CEO; and also selects 2
members of the PTI Board from among 
ICANN Board members. 
*	Tested this construct against the Public Comments, mindful that the PC was issued before
there were further details on PTI

Clarification on what 'inside board' means: 

*	From 13 May memo: "By “insider board,” we mean a PTI board comprised of a majority of
directors who are employed by ICANN, including members of ICANN management responsible for oversight
of the IANA functions."
*	In the 13 May memo, assumption that ICANN was selecting PTI Board. 
*	Not meant as a pejorative term

Action (Sidley): consider another term for 'inside'/'outside' Board

"Separation Process"

*	Chuck Gomes proposed some edits/clarifications
*	Composition for the IFRT and the SCWG would be the same

Composition 

The SCWG/IFRT would be composed as follows :

● ccNSO - 1 

● ccTLDs (non-ccNSO) - 1  

● Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG) - 2 

● Registrar Stakeholder Group (RsSG) - 1 

● Commercial Stakeholder Group (CSG) - 1 

● Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG) - 1 

● Government Advisory Committee (GAC) - 1 

● Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) - 1 

● Root Server Operators Advisory Committee (RSSAC) - 1 

● At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) - 1 

● CSC Liaison (selected by CSC) - 1

● Special IFR Team Liaison (selected by IFR Team) - 1

● Liaison from Protocol operational community - 1 (tbd with their approval)

● Liaison from Numbers operational community - 1 (tbd with their approval)

Composition is to remain an unresolved items, 

Suggestion that regional cc organizations could provide input to ccNSO in selection/appointment of
representative. 

Scope of IFRT

Action (Stephanie) -- will do an overview of draft to make sure clarification/scope for naming
functions is clear. 

Home of IFRT within ICANN so as to inherit resources and expertise

The group could make a recommendation on the "fit for purpose" so that appointing committees have an
idea of the skillset needed to make appointments. 

Review must be initiated by ICANN Board and approved by ICANN Board -- these are 'checks along the
way' for governance of the organization 

Open Issues: 

- initiation of special reviews (not having to go through Board approval; community consulation as
base for board approval; is Board approval a barrier timewise?)

- composition of IFRT and SIFR

Views of the group on unresolved issues: 

*	Chuck supports expansion of SCWG composition (with both ccTLD and gTLD expansion given the
specifics of the tasks at hand)
*	Martin still thinks that ccTLDs would be under-represented on IFRT but could live with
increasing to 2 ccNSO 
reps instead of one. Agreement with Chuck on expansion of SCWG
*	Avri has no strong issue with addition of cc member on IFRT, but concerned about alternates
and other forms of expansion. 

Recap: 

*	Make sure both groups are fit for purpose so, the CWG should specifiy skillsets for each
group
*	One additional ccNSO rep is possible on IFRT

Document resources: 

All Client Committee documents are here:
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Client+Committee>
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Client+Committee

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150529/f447f8f9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150529/f447f8f9/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150529/f447f8f9/smime-0001.p7s>