[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript DT-O Meeting on 20 July 2016

[Brenda Brewer]

Dear all,

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the DT-O Meeting on 20 July 2016 will be available here:  https://community.icann.org/x/8D_AAw

A copy of the notes and action item may be found below.

Kind regards,
Brenda
[---]
Notes

Slide 1
*        The second bullet point's:  ">" means arrows/chevrons, not "larger than."

How can we align PTI and ICANN Board on PTI budget?
*        PTI & ICANN Board should engage prior to community engagement
*        PTI OP&B should be reviewd by PTI Board and ICANN BFC at the same time for parallel visibility and alignment?

Community engagement - What should be included?
*        Public comment should be mandatory (Chuck, Cheryl, Olivier)
*        Community engagement period coincides with ICANN meeting. It fits well if face-to-face meeting is necessary (Xavier, Olivier)
*        May require to have a special involvement from CSC and direct customers within the community engagement period (Chuck)
*        Utilize the usual model of financial planning in terms of community engagement at the beginning/prior to public comment

Action Item: Develop the process that accounts for public comment (ICANN)



Do we need to have both PTI and ICANN board approval right after "respond to community feedback and update draft" step? ICANN's
budget public comment won't happen until towards the end of Q3 and may introduce complication.
*        Consider Board approval to occur after the ICANN's budget public comment? Replace "approval" with "receive" on the current timeline?

CWG proposal called for community approval whereas CCWG proposal called for veto power by community. Do we need a formal community "approval"?
*        With community veto power, no need for a formal community apprval (Chuck, Cheryl, Mary)

Missing items from the timeline (Slide 2)
*        Engagement with CSC (performance matter) and RZERC (technical or architectural matter)  if necessary at the end of fiscal year (Chuck)
*        Seek input from CSC & RZERC as an on-going bases as well as at the onset of the process (Xavier & Elise)
*        Make it clear when and how the engagement and elaboration with other groups occurs

Next Step
*        ICANN to develop a detailed timeline and process based on today's conversation
*        DT-O members attended today's call support the direction and believes this will meet the CWG recommendation. DT-O is available for consultation if needed.
*        Provide CWG the status update


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160720/4c76f91d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160720/4c76f91d/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 498 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160720/4c76f91d/image003-0001.png>