[Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT meeting on Wednesday 10 August

Wed Aug 10 11:10:11 UTC 2016

Thanks Sylvia,

That was my interpretation also.

Jonathan

From: Sylvia Cadena [mailto:sylvia at apnic.net] 
Sent: 08 August 2016 22:15
To: dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT meeting on Wednesday 10 August

Knowing the line of commentary that Marilia normally follows, I am almost certain she was referring to market distortions on the domain names industry, not what David is interpreting below. 

—————————————————————————

Sylvia Cadena  |  APNIC Community Partnerships Specialist |  <mailto:sylvia at apnic.net> sylvia at apnic.net

 <mailto:sylvia at voip.apnic.net> sylvia at voip.apnic.net | skypeID: sylviacadena

FB ISIF.asia | G+ ISIFAsia | @ISIF_Asia

6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD,  4101 Australia | PO Box 3646

Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 |  Fax: +61 7  3858 3199

 <http://www.apnic.net/> http://www.apnic.net |  <http://www.isif.asia/> http://www.isif.asia |  <https://blog.apnic.net/> https://blog.apnic.net/

* Love trees. Print only if necessary.

From: <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org <mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> > on behalf of David Tait <david.tait at icann.org <mailto:david.tait at icann.org> >
Date: Tuesday, 9 August 2016 at 1:25 AM
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org> >, "dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org <mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org> " <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org <mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org> >
Subject: Re: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT meeting on Wednesday 10 August

Dear All

Further to the email from Marika, we have reviewed the transcript from Helsinki as per the action items from the last meeting. The query regarding not using funds to distort competition came from Marilia Maciel:

“And in terms of recipients as well, I think that one important

point is that this money does -- is not given to -- to a project or

something that will distort competition inside ICANN itself. I

don't know how to -- how this could be represented in the

charter but I think that a guiding line for us should be that this

should not distort competition inside the organization.

So I take the point on -- on the market, the DNS market, but I

think that we need to be very careful about that.”

Upon reviewing this staff suspect she is referring to any project that would directly compete with ICANN, for example by creating an alternative root or something like that. This issue may be something for the CCWG as it relates to how the funds are used. However, should you wish us to follow-up for more information we would be happy to do so.

Kind regards,

David

From: <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org <mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> > on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org> >
Date: Monday, 8 August 2016 at 16:16
To: "dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org <mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org> " <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org <mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org> >
Subject: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT meeting on Wednesday 10 August

Dear All,

Please find below the proposed agenda for the next new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 10 August at 12.00 UTC. As a reminder, you will also find hereunder the action items from the last meeting.

Best regards,

Marika

Proposed Agenda – new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team Meeting – 10 August 2016

1.     Roll Call & Welcome

2.     Review timeline and discuss approach proposed by Sylvia to move forward (see timeline attached)

3.     Continue review of comments on draft charter (see latest version of comment review tool attached))

4.     Confirm time / date of next meeting

ACTION: Staff to try and clarify the meeting of Comment 8 from Helsinki meeting, does this mean not funding projects which fund competition in the market place then this is valid?

ACTION: Sylvia to circulate language which had been removed specifically prior to Helsinki meeting

ACTION: (i) DT to finalise Mandatory and enhanced statements of interest language and then board members seek input from board group, (ii) DT to determine content of mandatory SoI and criteria for inclusion/exclusion from CCWG and (iii) Deal with mission and conflict of interest issues as a whole rather than separately.

Marika Konings

Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 

Email: marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>   

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO

Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso>  and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers> .

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt-cwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20160810/22a35276/attachment-0001.html>