[Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT meeting on Wednesday 31 August at 19.30 UTC

Wed Aug 31 18:42:13 UTC 2016

I won't have time to send in comments, but will have ready for discussion.

On the .web funds, my reading was that they are 
CURRENTLY being held in a separate bank account 
pending investment, but that they would 
ultimately be combined with the other auction 
funds. Presuming court or other actions do not 
cause them to be refunded or otherwise dealt with.

Alan

At 31/08/2016 11:16 AM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:

>All,
>
>Two points.
>
>First, thank-you to Sylvia for the recent review of the document.
>
>Note also that I have done likewise today and 
>have included a commented / further modified 
>version (attached). I am willing to speak to 
>these points as we work through the document 
>tonight and do not expect that any suggested 
>changes or additions will be seen as material or, at least, controversial.
>
>Second, Afilias was a participant in the .web 
>auction. There is a reported 
><http://domainincite.com/20848-donuts-rolls-the-dice-with-22-5-million-web-lawsuit>lawsuit 
>around the outcome, which does not involve 
>Afilias. Notwithstanding, I believe it is not 
>appropriate for me to comment on or get involved 
>with any discussions around the proceeds from the .web auction.
>
>Talk with you all a little later.
>
>
>Jonathan
>
>From: Sylvia Cadena [mailto:sylvia at apnic.net]
>Sent: 31 August 2016 02:26
>To: dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>Subject: Re: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed 
>Agenda - new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT meeting on 
>Wednesday 31 August at 19.30 UTC
>
>Thanks Marika. Happy to focus the discussion on 
>the file â€œCCWG Auction Proceeds - Draft 
>Charter - items for discussion - Updated 30 
>August 2016â€ which hopefully we will be able 
>to finalize soon so that we can go through point 3 on the agenda.
>
>I would like to ask if the proceeds of the .WEB 
>are then considered as part of this process or 
>not, or what implication has that they are held 
>on a different account as per the message that 
>Asha and Erika shared. It doesnâ€™t have any 
>implication right? As they are listed here 
><http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/auctions/proceeds>http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/auctions/proceeds 
>they are all considered part of the same fund. 
>Right? I dont think that is an item for the 
>agenda though, but just wanted to have some clarify about that.
>
>Talk to you soon :)
>
>Regards,
>
>Sylvia
>
>
>
>
>
>————————â€”â€”â€”â€”â€”â€”———————â€€”â€”â€”â€”â€”————————â€”â€”â€”â€”â€”
>
>Sylvia Cadena  |  APNIC Community Partnerships 
>Specialist | <mailto:sylvia at apnic.net>sylvia at apnic.net
><mailto:sylvia at voip.apnic.net>sylvia at voip.apnic.net | skypeID: sylviacadena
>FB ISIF.asia | G+ ISIFAsia | @ISIF_Asia
>
>6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD,  4101 Australia | PO Box 3646
>Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 |  Fax: +61 7  3858 3199
><http://www.apnic.net/>http://www.apnic.net | 
>http://www.isif.asia | https://blog.apnic.net/
>* Love trees. Print only if necessary.
>
>
>From: 
><<mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org>dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> 
>on behalf of Marika Konings 
><<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>marika.konings at icann.org>
>Date: Wednesday, 31 August 2016 at 5:44 AM
>To: 
>"<mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" 
><<mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>Subject: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed 
>Agenda - new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT meeting on 
>Wednesday 31 August at 19.30 UTC
>
>Dear All,
>
>Please find below the proposed agenda for the 
>next new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT meeting which 
>has been scheduled for Wednesday 31 August at 19.30 UTC.
>
>Note, you will find attached two versions of the 
>draft charter. One version includes all comments 
>& edits made to date (note, in this version, 
>some of Sylviaâ€™s suggestions that were deemed 
>non-controversial have already been 
>incorporated) and one version in which all 
>non-controversial comments and/or edits have 
>been removed/accepted so that only those items 
>that need DT input / review are remaining (note, 
>most changes are still visible in redline). The 
>items requiring DT review are highlighted in 
>yellow in both versions. To facilitate the 
>review and discussion during tomorrowâ€™s 
>meeting, the focus will be on the second version 
>and more specifically the items highlighted in 
>yellow. As such, if there are any other items 
>that you believe need DT discussion, please flag those prior to the meeting.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Marika
>
>Proposed Agenda – new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT 
>Meeting – Wednesday 31 A1 August 2016
>
>1.     Roll call / Welcome
>2.     Review of latest version of draft charter (see attached):
>a.     Any comments / concerns in relation to 
>how remaining comments were addressed? (see 
>latest version of public comment review tool)
>b.     Any items that need to be discussed that 
>have not been flagged as â€˜yellowâ€™ (see 
>attached for current â€˜yellowâ€™ items)
>c.      Review and discuss items flagged in yellow (see attached)
>3.     Confirm deadline for final review & 
>comments and target date for sharing draft charter with SO/ACs
>4.     Confirm next meeting
>
>Marika Konings
>Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the 
>GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>Email: <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>marika.konings at icann.org
>
>Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
>Find out more about the GNSO by taking our 
><http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso>interactive 
>courses and visiting the 
><http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>GNSO 
>Newcomer pages.
>
>
>Content-Type: 
>application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document;
>         name="CCWG Auction Proceeds - Draft 
> Charter - items for discussion - Updated"
>  30 August 2016 JR Edit.docx"
>Content-Disposition: attachment;
>         filename="CCWG Auction Proceeds - Draft 
> Charter - items for discussion -"
>  Updated 30 August 2016 JR Edit.docx"
>X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
> 
>1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:d4HBoazr4NV3YOqd1GFzkkOSxIG+SDmc8LqRAz0AUy/ZzYQKo2JKrvqyBWZ1HYq7YZVeldohlv8lONmovffWo8JUGdzUHd490epu0WljoI8j6fgu0uEMurMx6SSQrpAdoQDIsBq97/95FOM4OS6my9L64CE8cNHjKops9HF08f59+AH9aTKZ15NBaaDRmmMcd5HsLxiU2kN5oKOsKoJGCg==
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
> 
>1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:d4HBoazr4NV3YOqd1GFzkkOSxIG+SDmc8LqRAz0AUy/ZzYQKo2JKrvqyBWZ1HYq7YZVeldohlv8lONmovffWo8JUGdzUHd490epu0WljoI8j6fgu0uEMurMx6SSQrpAdoQDIsBq97/95FOM4OS6my9L64CE8cNHjKops9HF08f59+AH9aTKZ15NBaaDRmmMcd5HsLxiU2kN5oKOsKoJGCg==
>
>_______________________________________________
>Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt-cwg-auctionproceeds
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt-cwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20160831/4ac7df93/attachment.html>