[Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT meeting on Wednesday 31 August at 19.30 UTC

Wed Aug 31 19:01:49 UTC 2016

Alan - You are correct with your observations but allow me to add Xavier to
comment on this point concerning the .web auction proceed money.

Xavier, please review comments from Sylvia, Jonathan and Alan.

Erika

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
wrote:

> I won't have time to send in comments, but will have ready for discussion.
>
> On the .web funds, my reading was that they are CURRENTLY being held in a
> separate bank account pending investment, but that they would ultimately be
> combined with the other auction funds. Presuming court or other actions do
> not cause them to be refunded or otherwise dealt with.
>
> Alan
>
> At 31/08/2016 11:16 AM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Two points.
>
> First, thank-you to Sylvia for the recent review of the document.
>
> Note also that I have done likewise today and have included a commented /
> further modified version (attached). I am willing to speak to these points
> as we work through the document tonight and do not expect that any
> suggested changes or additions will be seen as material or, at least,
> controversial.
>
> Second, Afilias was a participant in the .web auction. There is a reported
> lawsuit
> <http://domainincite.com/20848-donuts-rolls-the-dice-with-22-5-million-web-lawsuit>
> around the outcome, which does not involve Afilias. Notwithstanding, I
> believe it is not appropriate for me to comment on or get involved with any
> discussions around the proceeds from the .web auction.
>
> Talk with you all a little later.
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> *From:* Sylvia Cadena [ mailto:sylvia at apnic.net <sylvia at apnic.net>]
> *Sent:* 31 August 2016 02:26
> *To:* dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - new gTLD
> Auction Proceeds DT meeting on Wednesday 31 August at 19.30 UTC
>
> Thanks Marika. Happy to focus the discussion on the file â€œCCWG Auction
> Proceeds - Draft Charter - items for discussion - Updated 30 August 2016â€
> which hopefully we will be able to finalize soon so that we can go through
> point 3 on the agenda.
>
> I would like to ask if the proceeds of the .WEB are then considered as
> part of this process or not, or what implication has that they are held on
> a different account as per the message that Asha and Erika shared. It
> doesnâ€™t have any implication right? As they are listed here
> http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/auctions/proceeds they are all
> considered part of the same fund. Right? I dont think that is an item for
> the agenda though, but just wanted to have some clarify about that.
>
> Talk to you soon :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Sylvia
>
>
>
>
>
> ————————â€”â€”â€”â€”â€”â€”———————â€€”â€”â€”â€”â€”————————â€”â€”â€”â€”â€”
>
>
> *Sylvia Cadena  |  APNIC Community Partnerships Specialist |
> sylvia at apnic.net <sylvia at apnic.net> *sylvia at voip.apnic.net | skypeID:
> sylviacadena
> FB ISIF.asia | G+ ISIFAsia | @ISIF_Asia
>
> 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD,  4101 Australia | PO Box 3646
> Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 |  Fax: +61 7  3858 3199
> http://www.apnic.net | http://www.isif.asia | https://blog.apnic.net/
> * Love trees. Print only if necessary.
>
>
> *From: *< dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Marika
> Konings <marika.konings at icann.org >
> *Date: *Wednesday, 31 August 2016 at 5:44 AM
> *To: *" dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" < dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.
> org>
> *Subject: *[Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - new gTLD Auction
> Proceeds DT meeting on Wednesday 31 August at 19.30 UTC
>
> Dear All,
>
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the next new gTLD Auction
> Proceeds DT meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 31 August at
> 19.30 UTC.
>
> Note, you will find attached two versions of the draft charter. One
> version includes all comments & edits made to date (note, in this version,
> some of Sylviaâ€™s suggestions that were deemed non-controversial have
> already been incorporated) and one version in which all non-controversial
> comments and/or edits have been removed/accepted so that only those items
> that need DT input / review are remaining (note, most changes are still
> visible in redline). The items requiring DT review are highlighted in
> yellow in both versions. To facilitate the review and discussion during
> tomorrowâ€™s meeting, the focus will be on the second version and more
> specifically the items highlighted in yellow. As such, if there are any
> other items that you believe need DT discussion, please flag those prior to
> the meeting.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> Proposed Agenda – new gTLD Auction Proceeds DT Meeting – Wednesday 31 A1
> August 2016
>
> 1.     Roll call / Welcome
> 2.     Review of latest version of draft charter (see attached):
> a.     Any comments / concerns in relation to how remaining comments were
> addressed? (see latest version of public comment review tool)
> b.     Any items that need to be discussed that have not been flagged as
> â€˜yellowâ€™ (see attached for current â€˜yellowâ€™ items)
> c.      Review and discuss items flagged in yellow (see attached)
> 3.     Confirm deadline for final review & comments and target date for
> sharing draft charter with SO/ACs
> 4.     Confirm next meeting
>
> Marika Konings
> Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation
> for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> Email: marika.konings at icann.org
>
> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
> <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
> <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>
> .
>
>
> Content-Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.
> wordprocessingml.document;
>          name="CCWG Auction Proceeds - Draft Charter - items for
> discussion - Updated"
>  30 August 2016 JR Edit.docx"
> Content-Disposition: attachment;
>          filename="CCWG Auction Proceeds - Draft Charter - items for
> discussion -"
>  Updated 30 August 2016 JR Edit.docx"
> X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
>          1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:d4HBoazr4NV3YOqd1GFzkkOSxIG+SDmc8LqRAz0AUy/
> ZzYQKo2JKrvqyBWZ1HYq7YZVeldohlv8lONmovffWo8JUGdzUHd490epu0Wl
> joI8j6fgu0uEMurMx6SSQrpAdoQDIsBq97/95FOM4OS6my9L64CE8cNHjKops9HF08f59+
> AH9aTKZ15NBaaDRmmMcd5HsLxiU2kN5oKOsKoJGCg==
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
> X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
>          1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:d4HBoazr4NV3YOqd1GFzkkOSxIG+SDmc8LqRAz0AUy/
> ZzYQKo2JKrvqyBWZ1HYq7YZVeldohlv8lONmovffWo8JUGdzUHd490epu0Wl
> joI8j6fgu0uEMurMx6SSQrpAdoQDIsBq97/95FOM4OS6my9L64CE8cNHjKops9HF08f59+
> AH9aTKZ15NBaaDRmmMcd5HsLxiU2kN5oKOsKoJGCg==
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt-cwg-auctionproceeds
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt-cwg-auctionproceeds
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt-cwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20160831/0927c392/attachment-0001.html>