[Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] mp3 and attendance new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team 09 September 2016
Terri Agnew
terri.agnew at icann.org
Fri Sep 9 16:18:47 UTC 2016
Dear All,
Please find the MP3 recording for the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team held on 09 September 2016 at 14:00 UTC: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-auction-proceeds-09sep16-en.mp3<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=NrFWbrBstcrPWP369qgbqlXiSKeL20xnUXzI03ZqpsuDGgbutH3nVNCyFQnIoBtiHFTcaeu4QmqxpOexJvnwAjOvKAAwzAho1fR6nkeAxPI-3D_nEX-2FaOijqgcJlSz5SkmueJu3tRbmaDiuX89gT35tStEeSHP9whdoceObpMxYsFLQddiMZpQjIv8dk6BsBGSJXH7VWN4SGLCJgbGKCk6E-2FTErjF4OKNQt65Dk9NF54IJ9kQpmDNySj7bbNz9G4dXi5BgbCZotTx8KNfyeB0z00f8KsMfETeTNKd7vy2kKI7tttQUIwid4NAhxXgT3nZYwmqjS2qQYfoGLEN1wkZaSn6LDKKT7RK-2B0uCjaGiTnag-2Bpu2hO1mil14I98-2F4sZ4slWcEpnprO7fGWLisMzaKvH3VJ7tBBdKYlcdtAzdw2LvdZT3RNeql7OmK3YlvJ8zuRBKNOMD4BN8HyssUdJorjsrCbT5x6uw1PIVP6-2BbdObKTRdhjrrYcEIEoHnPqCkqV-2BLSfsHlEqkypLQTSxBi1n1TkNh9xtC-2FnUTBPOZwOjIj5ImaY9U8-2BZgMDUXBM2yenHwh-2FlY-2BSZxXA7onVQaaWYKnjmBUXCgX1s8vF13lh5o8D0>
On page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar>
The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar
Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt-cwg-auctionproceeds/
Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/px6AAw
Attendees:
ALAC
Alan Greenberg
ASO
Sylvia Cadena
ccNSO
Will not be participating in the drafting team
GAC
None
GNSO
Jonathan Robinson
Tony Harris
RSSAC
Kaveh Ranjbar
SSAC
Russ Mundy
Lyman Chapin
Board
Board Liaisons
Erika Mann
Asha Hemrajani
Board appointed staff advisors
Samantha Eisner
Apologies:
Olga Cavalli
ICANN staff:
Marika Konings
Julie Hedlund
Lauren Allison
David Tait
Terri Agnew
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Terri Agnew
-------------------------------
Adobe Connect chat transcript for 09 September 2016
Terri Agnew:Welcome to the New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Charter Drafting Team held on Friday, 09 September 2016
Terri Agnew:agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/oRusAw
Alan Greenberg:waiting on bridge...
Asha Hemrajani:Good evening all
Alan Greenberg:on
Marika Konings:FYI, Lauren pointed out that we didn't include links to the high interest session in BA as well as the cross-community session under 'important document links' so we will include these for the final version.
Asha Hemrajani:yes indeed...good catch Lauren
Terri Agnew:Welcome Kaveh Ranjbar
Asha Hemrajani:Sounds good so far Jonathan
Asha Hemrajani:Yes would like to take the time to review Sylvia's comments
Samantha Eisner 2:I think that we can add a line to clarify
Samantha Eisner 2:"These requirements will apply to activities across any location where applicants are located or intend to use the funds."
Terri Agnew:Welcoe Erika Mann
Terri Agnew:@Samantha, let me know if a dial out on telephone is needed
Erika Mann:Thank you Terri
Samantha Eisner 2:I think that's right, Alan
Asha Hemrajani:That's true Alan
Erika Mann:Can you write this down Alan?
Samantha Eisner 2:These requirement will apply comparable activities . . "
Asha Hemrajani:I have no issue with adding Alan's added words
Erika Mann:Good idea
Asha Hemrajani:+1
Samantha Eisner 2:sounds good
Erika Mann:That's much better, agree Jonathan
Asha Hemrajani:I agree with Alan's language - we have to ringfence this
Marika Konings:the problem statement refers to the origina of auction proceeds and link with the new gTLD program
Erika Mann:Let's look for a better wording and let's de-link these two points.
Jonathan Robinson:@Erika. Old hand?
Terri Agnew:Welcome Tony Harris
Tony Harris:Hi, sorry I am late
Asha Hemrajani:Marika, yes but I would like stronger clearer language in addition to what was proposed by Sylvia
Samantha Eisner 2:Teh consdirations of overhead are one of the concerns in a longterm program. I see Sylvia's words as allowing for those types of considerations
Terri Agnew:Sylvia Cadena is on audio only
Samantha Eisner 2:I don't know that it means to limit the timeframe of the programs that are funded
Tony Harris:Some sort of time limit is important
Erika Mann 2:It is actually not muted. I had to redial. Wonder whethre the second connection is still open, though I can't see it. Terrry, can you check this please?
Samantha Eisner 2:I think that it would be important to not have the CCWG consider opportunities such as additional fundraising to support an ongoing process; that opens up a whole different world of legal and compliance issues
Asha Hemrajani:@Sam from my perspective, I am not keen on limiting the timeframe of the programmes that are funded...rather I think the disbursement organization should have a finite life.
Asha Hemrajani:+1 Sam
Tony Harris:Conditions can change and the original intent of the project to be funded can find itself in a different context
Samantha Eisner 2:@Jonathan, no concern with Sylvia's language
Erika Mann 2:I will write my points
Terri Agnew:@Erika, it might help to turn down your speakers
Terri Agnew:Please let me know if a dial out on the telephone is needed
RussMundy-SSAC:I am satisfied with Sylvia's wording as it is WRT being able to have additional sources of funding being able to contribute
Erika Mann 2:I think so, Terry can you shut down one mike?
Jonathan Robinson:@Sam. Thank-you noted. Others please check Sylvia's proposed language and see if this works for you.
Terri Agnew:will do
Erika Mann 2:Thank you Terri
Tony Harris:Where is Sylvia´s language in the doc?
RussMundy-SSAC:I agree that fund raising is outside of the CCWG scope
Marika Konings:Sylvia suggested alternative language: 1. What aspects should be considered to define a timeframe for the funds allocation mechanism to operate? E.g. The timeframe for the operation of this new mechanism may provide the opportunity for long term support, or for funding to be released in tranches linked to milestone achievements, single or multiple disbursements.
Tony Harris:I am OK with Sylvia's text
Erika Mann 2:1) we should not overcomplicate the language. Sam is right, we should not talk at this stage about potential additional funding. 2) I think we should neither discuss a timeframe for the fund, agree with Sylvia and Alan.
Terri Agnew:@Erika, I am unable to deactive one of the mics. Are both AC connections needed? I can remove one of them if not
Erika Mann 2:I will shut down the system, Terri and will rejoin in a minute.
Jonathan Robinson:@Sam. I recall that overhead limitation is still in the doc
Marika Konings:See 8: What aspects should be considered to determine an appropriate level of overhead that supports the principles outlined in this charter
RussMundy-SSAC:I agree that tasking the CCWG with defining a timeframe for the use of the available funds is very reasonable
Asha Hemrajani:@russ do you mean defining the timeframe for use of funds or disbursement of funds?
Erika Mann:Apologies, had to reboot everything
Erika Mann:Where are we now?
Samantha Eisner 2:@ Russ, the reporting is captured elsewhere, such as in item 9 below
Asha Hemrajani:fair enough Russ, but then we as the DT could indicate in the charter that the CCWG should do this
Jonathan Robinson:How about? What aspects should be considered to define a timeframe, if any, for the funds allocation mechanism to operate as well as the disbursements of funds?
David Tait:Apologies all I have to drop off to staff another PDP call
Asha Hemrajani:sorry old hand
RussMundy-SSAC:My appologies but I do have a hard stop at the top of the hour so will be dropping off if we haven't finished
RussMundy-SSAC:I agree with the process that Jonathan just described
Marika Konings:Yes - I will add
Marika Konings:I don't think line numbers work in a table, but I can try
Asha Hemrajani:Thanks Jonathan
Asha Hemrajani:Bye!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt-cwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20160909/199d5dc5/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds
mailing list