[DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.
Paul M Kane - CWG
paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk
Fri May 1 17:32:15 UTC 2015
Thanks Elise - I appreciate you are trying to have the work-flow documents
released to the SLE Design Team.
Once we have the work-flow documents, it would be great to have a call to
discuss how our findings of real-world activity ensure the SLE captures all
aspects of the RZM process.
I also welcome and agree with Theresa's comments below:
Quoting Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org>:
> We have no desire to affect the results of the
> community processes. We also believe that it would be more appropriate to
> maintain the status quo until the conclusion of the transition process to
> not pre-empt or create a perception of pre-empting any of the community
> consensus process around any areas in the finalization of the transition.
Samantha - would you please expedite the process please. NTIA are yet to
receive your request to share ICANN's internal IANA work-flow diagrams with the
Design Team.
Have a great w/end all
Best
Paul
Quoting Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>:
> Hello Paul,
>
> We too would like to help you finalize the Service Level Expectation
> document and are awaiting all necessary authorizations to release the
> documents in question.
>
> May I suggest, in the mean time, that we schedule another teleconference
> with Design Team A to review line by line the SLEs that are in the draft
> document to understand what is requested and to provide preliminary feedback
> on feasibility of implementation. This would enable the design team to
> continue work on refining its draft.
>
> Best regards,
> -- Elise
>
>
> From: Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk>
> Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 2:00 AM
> To: Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>
> Cc: "dt1 at icann.org" <dt1 at icann.org>, Kim Davies <kim.davies at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.
>
> > Morning Elise
> >
> > We are trying to finalise the Service Level Expectation document for the
> IANA
> > transition.
> >
> > Would you please provide the work-flow documents you current have so we
> can
> > capture what you are doing now and discuss with you which steps you
> consider
> > are
> > to be removed as part of NTIA's withdrawal from the process.
> >
> > The balance of the IANA RZM work flow documents can follow and be
> discussed,
> > later.
> >
> > I understand that IANA RZM uses a ticketing system to initiate and receive
> > emails to Registry customers. Please ensure that technical resource are
> > available (as is standard industry practice) to enable IANA to
> automatically
> > monitor each transaction and collect statistics on its customers use of
> the
> > ticketing system.
> >
> > Speak soon I hope
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > Quoting Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>:
> >
> >> Hello Jay,
> >>
> >> Paul¹s email requested ³access to all work-flow process documents² for
> the
> >> root zone management function. Including sub-processes, there are quite
> a
> >> few work flow processes for the root zone function. We are reviewing all
> of
> >> them as per the request.
> >>
> >> Let me assure you we are not creating new documentation in response to
> the
> >> request, and we are proceeding as fast as possible to fulfill the
> request.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> -- Elise
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Jay Daley <jay at nzrs.net.nz>
> >> Date: Sunday, April 19, 2015 at 1:33 PM
> >> To: "dt1 at icann.org" <dt1 at icann.org>
> >> Cc: Kim Davies <kim.davies at icann.org>, Elise Gerich
> >> <elise.gerich at icann.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.
> >>
> >>> > Morning all
> >>> >
> >>> > i don¹t see much point in us having this call without the
> documentation
> >> from
> >>> > IANA. The screenshot of the process flow (thanks Elise) looks pretty
> >>>
> much
> >> the
> >>> > same as the process flow encoded in the expectations of the proposed
> SLA,
> >> so
> >>> > we really need to see the more detailed process flow to understand
> the
> >> issues
> >>> > Kim raised in the last call.
> >>> >
> >>> > It sounds as if IANA are bundling a whole lot of things together to
> send
> >> us
> >>> > when we would benefit from the process flow being sent as soon as
> >>> possible
> >>> > (since it must already exist, all it requires is NTIA permission).
> The
> >> other
> >>> > documents, currently being written, can come later.
> >>> >
> >>> > If we do go ahead then I can make this time. If we bring it forward
> an
> >> hour
> >>> > then I can only join for 30 minutes (school run).
> >>> >
> >>> > cheers
> >>> > Jay
> >>> >
> >>>> >> On 17/04/2015, at 9:16 pm, Patricio Poblete
> >>>> <patricio.poblete at gmail.com>
> >>>> >> wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Paul,
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> I cannot join the call at this hour (6 pm) in Chile, but I could
> if
> it
> >> was
> >>>> >> one hour earlier.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Patricio
> >>>> >> P. S. Please announce also the UTC time
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On Apr 17, 2015 4:29 AM, "Paul M Kane - CWG"
> <paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk>
> >>>> >> wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> To give ICANN legal more time to facilitate disclosure of the
> required
> >> info
> >>>> >> may
> >>>> >> I suggest the time of next call is put back to Monday 20th
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> This also gives us time to review our document
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> To have as many participants involved in the call can I suggest
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Tuesday 9am Auckland time
> >>>> >> Monday 10 pm London time
> >>>> >> Monday 5pm EST New York
> >>>> >> Monday 2 pm PST LA time
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> I think the above is correct......
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Could everyone that is able to attend please confirm if this works
> for
> >> them
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Have a great w/end
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Best
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Paul
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Quoting Kim Davies <kim.davies at icann.org>:
> >>>> >>
> >>>>>> >>> > Hi Paul,
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>>>> >>>> > > Would you please ask ICANN legal to check that NTIA has
> been
> sent
> >> the
> >>>>>>>> >>>> > > disclosure request for IANA Root Services.
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>> >>> > ICANN is still preparing the bundle of materials that is
> >>>>>> responsive
> >> to
> >>>>> >>> your
> >>>>>> >>> > request. Once it has completed the internal review process it
> will be
> >>>>> >>> sent to
> >>>>>> >>> > NTIA for their permission to disclose. As we noted on the
> call,
> ICANN
> >> is
> >>>>>> >>> > doing this as quickly as possible ‹ not just for this Design
> Team
> but
> >>>>> >>> others
> >>>>>> >>> > that have asked for information ‹ but it is not an
> instantaneous
> >>>>> >>> process.
> >>>>>> >>> > The DIDP process is lead by ICANN¹s Legal department but
> they
> have
> >> asked
> >> us
> >>>>>> >>> > in IANA for clarifications and help compiling the relevant
> >>>>>>
> internal
> >>>>>> >>> > documentation.
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>>>> >>>> > > Can the SLE DT we have a call on Monday (20th) next week
> to
> run
> >>>>>> >>>> through
> >>>>>> >>> > your
> >>>>>>>> >>>> > > comments and all being well the flow charts to make sure
> the
> SLE
> >> is
> >>>>>> >>> > complete.
> >>>>>>>> >>>> > > What time (morning) works for you?
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>> >>> > At this stage, it looks like I can accommodate any reasonable
> time on
> >>>>>> >>> > Monday.
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>> >>> > kim
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>> >> dt1 mailing list
> >>>> >> dt1 at icann.org
> >>>> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt1
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>> >> dt1 mailing list
> >>>> >> dt1 at icann.org
> >>>> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt1
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Jay Daley
> >>> > Chief Executive
> >>> > NZRS Ltd
> >>> > desk: +64 4 931 6977
> >>> > mobile: +64 21 678840
> >>> > linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
More information about the dt1
mailing list