[DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.
Paul M Kane - CWG
paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk
Fri May 8 18:42:18 UTC 2015
Thanks Elise
I confirm receipt of the response from ICANN Legal following our DIDP request.
On or after the 12th May 2015, we look forward to receiving the current detailed
IANA process workflow documents (with comments as to why any "sensitive"
information has been redacted) so we can work cooperatively with you to create a
professional Service Level Expectation (SLE) document for the benefit of the
whole community.
Have a great w/end
Best
Paul
Quoting Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>:
> Hi Paul,
>
> ICANN has published its response on the ICANN website to your request for
> workflow documents.
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/transparency-en
>
> I just wanted to send a quick note to confirm that you had received the
> response.
>
> Regards,
> -- Elise
>
>
> From: Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk>
> Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 10:32 AM
> To: Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>
> Cc: "dt1 at icann.org" <dt1 at icann.org>, Kim Davies <kim.davies at icann.org>,
> Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.
>
> >
> > Thanks Elise - I appreciate you are trying to have the work-flow documents
> > released to the SLE Design Team.
> >
> > Once we have the work-flow documents, it would be great to have a call to
> > discuss how our findings of real-world activity ensure the SLE captures
> all
> > aspects of the RZM process.
> >
> > I also welcome and agree with Theresa's comments below:
> >
> > Quoting Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org>:
> >
> >
> >> We have no desire to affect the results of the
> >> community processes. We also believe that it would be more appropriate
> to
> >> maintain the status quo until the conclusion of the transition process
> to
> >> not pre-empt or create a perception of pre-empting any of the community
> >> consensus process around any areas in the finalization of the
> transition.
> >
> > Samantha - would you please expedite the process please. NTIA are yet to
> > receive your request to share ICANN's internal IANA work-flow diagrams
> with
> > the
> > Design Team.
> >
> > Have a great w/end all
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > Quoting Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>:
> >
> >> Hello Paul,
> >>
> >> We too would like to help you finalize the Service Level Expectation
> >> document and are awaiting all necessary authorizations to release the
> >> documents in question.
> >>
> >> May I suggest, in the mean time, that we schedule another
> teleconference
> >> with Design Team A to review line by line the SLEs that are in the draft
> >> document to understand what is requested and to provide preliminary
> feedback
> >> on feasibility of implementation. This would enable the design team to
> >> continue work on refining its draft.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> -- Elise
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk>
> >> Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 2:00 AM
> >> To: Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>
> >> Cc: "dt1 at icann.org" <dt1 at icann.org>, Kim Davies <kim.davies at icann.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.
> >>
> >>> > Morning Elise
> >>> >
> >>> > We are trying to finalise the Service Level Expectation document for
> the
> >> IANA
> >>> > transition.
> >>> >
> >>> > Would you please provide the work-flow documents you current have so
> we
> >> can
> >>> > capture what you are doing now and discuss with you which steps you
> >> consider
> >>> > are
> >>> > to be removed as part of NTIA's withdrawal from the process.
> >>> >
> >>> > The balance of the IANA RZM work flow documents can follow and be
> >> discussed,
> >>> > later.
> >>> >
> >>> > I understand that IANA RZM uses a ticketing system to initiate and
> >>> receive
> >>> > emails to Registry customers. Please ensure that technical resource
> are
> >>> > available (as is standard industry practice) to enable IANA to
> >> automatically
> >>> > monitor each transaction and collect statistics on its customers use
> of
> >> the
> >>> > ticketing system.
> >>> >
> >>> > Speak soon I hope
> >>> >
> >>> > Best
> >>> >
> >>> > Paul
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Quoting Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>:
> >>> >
> >>>> >> Hello Jay,
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Paul¹s email requested ³access to all work-flow process
> documents²
> for
> >> the
> >>>> >> root zone management function. Including sub-processes, there are
> >>>> quite
> >> a
> >>>> >> few work flow processes for the root zone function. We are
> reviewing
> all
> >> of
> >>>> >> them as per the request.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Let me assure you we are not creating new documentation in response
> to
> >> the
> >>>> >> request, and we are proceeding as fast as possible to fulfill the
> >> request.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Best regards,
> >>>> >> -- Elise
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> From: Jay Daley <jay at nzrs.net.nz>
> >>>> >> Date: Sunday, April 19, 2015 at 1:33 PM
> >>>> >> To: "dt1 at icann.org" <dt1 at icann.org>
> >>>> >> Cc: Kim Davies <kim.davies at icann.org>, Elise Gerich
> >>>> >> <elise.gerich at icann.org>
> >>>> >> Subject: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background
> >>>>
> info.
> >>>> >>
> >>>>>> >>> > Morning all
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>> >>> > i don¹t see much point in us having this call without the
> >> documentation
> >>>> >> from
> >>>>>> >>> > IANA. The screenshot of the process flow (thanks Elise)
> looks
> pretty
> >>>>> >>>
> >> much
> >>>> >> the
> >>>>>> >>> > same as the process flow encoded in the expectations of the
> >>>>>> proposed
> >> SLA,
> >>>> >> so
> >>>>>> >>> > we really need to see the more detailed process flow to
> >>>>>> understand
> >> the
> >>>> >> issues
> >>>>>> >>> > Kim raised in the last call.
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>> >>> > It sounds as if IANA are bundling a whole lot of things
> together
> to
> >> send
> >>>> >> us
> >>>>>> >>> > when we would benefit from the process flow being sent as soon
> as
> >>>>> >>> possible
> >>>>>> >>> > (since it must already exist, all it requires is NTIA
> >>>>>> permission).
> >> The
> >>>> >> other
> >>>>>> >>> > documents, currently being written, can come later.
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>> >>> > If we do go ahead then I can make this time. If we bring it
> forward
> >> an
> >>>> >> hour
> >>>>>> >>> > then I can only join for 30 minutes (school run).
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>> >>> > cheers
> >>>>>> >>> > Jay
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> On 17/04/2015, at 9:16 pm, Patricio Poblete
> >>>>>> >>>> <patricio.poblete at gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Paul,
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> I cannot join the call at this hour (6 pm) in Chile,
> but I
> could
> >> if
> >> it
> >>>> >> was
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> one hour earlier.
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Patricio
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> P. S. Please announce also the UTC time
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> On Apr 17, 2015 4:29 AM, "Paul M Kane - CWG"
> >> <paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> To give ICANN legal more time to facilitate disclosure
> of
> the
> >> required
> >>>> >> info
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> may
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> I suggest the time of next call is put back to Monday
> 20th
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> This also gives us time to review our document
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> To have as many participants involved in the call can I
> suggest
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Tuesday 9am Auckland time
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Monday 10 pm London time
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Monday 5pm EST New York
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Monday 2 pm PST LA time
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> I think the above is correct......
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Could everyone that is able to attend please confirm if
> this
> works
> >> for
> >>>> >> them
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Have a great w/end
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Best
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Paul
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> Quoting Kim Davies <kim.davies at icann.org>:
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > Hi Paul,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> > > Would you please ask ICANN legal to check
> that NTIA has
> >> been
> >> sent
> >>>> >> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> > > disclosure request for IANA Root
> Services.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > ICANN is still preparing the bundle of
> materials
> that is
> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> responsive
> >>>> >> to
> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> your
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > request. Once it has completed the internal
> review
> process it
> >> will be
> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> sent to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > NTIA for their permission to disclose. As we
> noted
> on the
> >> call,
> >> ICANN
> >>>> >> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > doing this as quickly as possible ‹ not
> just for
> this Design
> >> Team
> >> but
> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> others
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > that have asked for information ‹ but it
> is not
> an
> >> instantaneous
> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> process.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > The DIDP process is lead by ICANN¹s Legal
> department but
> >> they
> >> have
> >>>> >> asked
> >>>> >> us
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > in IANA for clarifications and help compiling
> the
> relevant
> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>
> >> internal
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > documentation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> > > Can the SLE DT we have a call on Monday
> (20th) next week
> >> to
> >> run
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> through
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> > > comments and all being well the flow
> charts
> to make sure
> >> the
> >> SLE
> >>>> >> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > complete.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> > > What time (morning) works for you?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > At this stage, it looks like I can accommodate
> any
> reasonable
> >> time on
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > Monday.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> > kim
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> dt1 mailing list
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> dt1 at icann.org
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt1
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> dt1 mailing list
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> dt1 at icann.org
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt1
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>> >>> > --
> >>>>>> >>> > Jay Daley
> >>>>>> >>> > Chief Executive
> >>>>>> >>> > NZRS Ltd
> >>>>>> >>> > desk: +64 4 931 6977
> >>>>>> >>> > mobile: +64 21 678840
> >>>>>> >>> > linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>>>> >>> >
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
More information about the dt1
mailing list