[DTC CSC] CSC Charter 0 7

[Donna Austin]

Thanks David

We're very conscious that this needs a home which is why we agreed to leave the language in as a placeholder, while expressing our concern about remit.

I'm hopeful that the new text will help us get around the 'remit' issue, by enabling the CSC to have the discussion and then hand over to IANA to run a consultation and then link implementation back to performance.

Donna
From: David Conrad [mailto:david.conrad at icann.org]
Sent: Friday, 10 April 2015 1:45 PM
To: Donna Austin; dt3 at icann.org
Cc: Kim Davies
Subject: Re: CSC Charter 0 7

Donna,

Speaking for myself only, the wording looks fine for me.

If others feel gives the CSC an inappropriate role, I would think a key recommendation from the Design Team to the CWG is that some (other) mechanism must be defined to accommodate technological/evolutionary changes in the Internet.

Regards,
-drc

From: Donna Austin <Donna.Austin at ariservices.com<mailto:Donna.Austin at ariservices.com>>
Date: Friday, April 10, 2015 at 1:31 PM
To: "dt3 at icann.org<mailto:dt3 at icann.org>" <dt3 at icann.org<mailto:dt3 at icann.org>>
Cc: David Conrad <david.conrad at icann.org<mailto:david.conrad at icann.org>>, Kim Davies <kim.davies at icann.org<mailto:kim.davies at icann.org>>
Subject: CSC Charter 0 7

All

I think I've captured the changes suggested from the call this morning.

On the big issue of 'technological changes' I've flagged that the Design Team has concerns about the CSC being responsible for anything other than monitoring. I've also provided some new text to try to overcome that concern, which I'm repeating here for ease of reference. I'm happy to take this out and just leave what we had and express our concerns if others do not think this is a viable option in that it does not overcome our primary concern.

The CSC, in consultation with registry operators, is authorised to discuss with the IANA Functions Operator ways to enhance the provision of IANA's operational services to meet changing technological environments; as a means to address performance issues; or other unforeseen circumstances. In the event it is agreed that a material change in IANA functions services or operations would be beneficial, the CSC reserves the right to call for a community consultation and independent validation, to be convened by IANA, on the proposed change. Any recommended change must be approved by the ccNSO and RySG.

The IANA Functions Operator would be responsible for implementing any recommended changes and must ensure that sufficient testing is undertaken to ensure smooth transition and no disruption to service levels.

I'm conscious that we need to wrap this up today and get to the CWG, but it would be useful if we could defer until such time as Staffan and Martin have had a chance to review.

Thanks

Donna

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt3/attachments/20150410/a2e08331/attachment.html>