[DTM Escalation] Possible Use cases

[Staffan Jonson]

Avri et al.
Please find my respons to  Avris questions in  enclosed word document.

My answers in blue

☺
Staffan



With best regards
Staffan Jonson

Mr. Staffan Jonson, Senior Policy Adviser
.SE (The Internet Infrastructure foundation)

BOX 7399 | SE-103 91 STOCKHOLM | SWEDEN
Direct: +46 8 452 35 74 | SMS: +46 73 317 39 67
staffan.jonson at iis.se | www.iis.se/en




Från: dt6-bounces at icann.org [mailto:dt6-bounces at icann.org] För Avri Doria
Skickat: den 20 mars 2015 15:24
Till: dt6 at icann.org
Ämne: [DTM Escalation] Possible Use cases

Hi,

Sometimes I have to give up before the thoughts I need start coming to me.

Some possible cases.  Not sure about them all, but put out a call for suggestions on a couple of lists I am on.  I am still getting email and trying to pick the best offerings to pass on.

- One of the new TLDs, especially one in a 'critical' area, is not keeping up its TLD whois correctly and cannot be reached.  Do they need to go through ICANN compliance or can they go directly to IANA to complain.  And if they do go through complainace, does compliance have access to an escalation procedure.

- IETF produces a new set of protocol elements  for TLDs and IANA has not implemented it. For example a new twist to DNSSEC, or a even replacement for DNSSEC.    Assume this is a change that registries are not fond of and IANA is not particularly interested in either.  Who do those affected, supposing it is not Registries but user communities, complain to?

This begs the question: are IETF protocol changes mandatory on IANA if they affect the Namining community. Can the decision to implement new protocol elements in the DNS be subject to any ICANN policy process?  Who decides which protocols IANA implements and which options are made mandatory.

- A security expert notices a new  threat in the IANA DNS implementation.   Can they notify IANA and escalate the issue?  Or is their only solution to either convince the SSAC or to write very visible articles?

Speaking of the SSAC, or RSSAC for that matter,  if they notice that something needs fixing, who do they call?

- Minsistry A decides that a redelgation of their sovereign TLD was done without their approval (maybe Ministry B said it was ok.) How if this handled. Is there an escalation procedure?

- A national user community objects to a re-delegation saying the RFC 1591 was not adhered to in granting the delegation to NewRegistry who is in bed with Minister A (figuratively, I assume).  Who do they take their case to and how do they escalate it if thy don't get satisfaction?

________________________________
[http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png]<http://www.avast.com/>


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com<http://www.avast.com/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt6/attachments/20150323/7f23fa0d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DT M Escalation.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 18057 bytes
Desc: DT M Escalation.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt6/attachments/20150323/7f23fa0d/DTMEscalation-0001.docx>