[Finance-sc] Fast track vs. normal track requests

Thu Mar 28 17:40:35 UTC 2013

You are right Eduardo,

But since some RALOs felt that the process wasn’t clear enough, and said
they missed the deadline because of that, Olivier asked us whether we think
it’s suitable to open a second round for the normal track (Deadline: 19
April I think). 

But if the final decision is to open a second round, we need to inform the
RALOs as soon as possible so that they can prepare their request on time for
the ALAC Finance and Budget Sub-Committee to approve and to send to the
controller before the deadline of 19 April.

My address tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org is not working properly any more. Please
use one of the 2 following addresses: tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn or
tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Tijani BEN JEMAA

Executive Director

Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)

Phone:  + 216 41 649 605

Mobile: + 216 98 330 114

Fax:       + 216 70 853 376

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

De : Eduardo Diaz [mailto:eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com] 
Envoyé : jeudi 28 mars 2013 14:58
À : Tijani BEN JEMAA
Cc : Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; Finance and Budget SubCommittee; ICANN
AtLarge Staff
Objet : Re: [Finance-sc] Fast track vs. normal track requests

Tijani:

I am confused. I though that there was a march 22 deadline to submit any
request to the fast track process.

-ed

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Tijani BEN JEMAA
<tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn> wrote:

Olivier,

Indeed, I do think that we need to open the a second round since we have
time for it. The most important thing is to inform the RALOs as soon as
possible so that they will prepare their requests on time for the
sub-committee to approve and send to the controller.

My address tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org is not working properly any more. Please
use one of the 2 following addresses: tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn or
tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Tijani BEN JEMAA

Executive Director

Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)

Phone:  + 216 41 649 605 <tel:%2B%20216%2041%20649%20605> 

Mobile: + 216 98 330 114 <tel:%2B%20216%2098%20330%20114> 

Fax:       + 216 70 853 <tel:%2B%20216%2070%20853%20376>  376

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

-----Message d'origine-----
De : finance-sc-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:finance-sc-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de Olivier MJ
Crepin-Leblond
Envoyé : mardi 26 mars 2013 01:26
À : Finance and Budget SubCommittee
Cc : ICANN AtLarge Staff
Objet : [Finance-sc] Fast track vs. normal track requests

Dear members of the Finance & Budget sub-committee,

a recent discussion with one of the RALO leaderships made it appear that

they were really rushed to go through their internal processes to

approve requests. Perhaps it was a lack of communication from members of

the FBSC to their region, perhaps it was just the fact that we had less

than one month to put together the budget requests.

As you'll note on the ICANN Finance WIKI, there are actually two deadlines:

https://community.icann.org/display/projfinadhocws/At+Large+-+FY14+Special+B
udget+Request

      Deadlines:

  *

          Early vote/decision by April => submit by 3/22/2013

  *

          Vote/decision by June => submit by 4/29/2013

In order to save ourselves from needed to frantically work immediately

after the ICANN meeting in April, the request from RALOs to send their

requests was aligned with the fast track. This put pressure on them to

get their proposals done fast - but some might have forgotten about

requests which would not need a fast track.

As a result, I am asking you, members of the FBSC, whether we should

open a new round of RALO requests, if they wish to add any request that

would take place from November 2013 onwards -- hence using the "Normal

Track".

If this is the case, then Gisella has already prepared a placeholder for

a call on 22 April 2013 - and we *could* use this call to:

1. follow-up on any follow-up requests from Finance on our initial round

2. discuss the second round of requests

Any suggestions?

Kind regards,

Olivier

_______________________________________________

Finance-sc mailing list

Finance-sc at atlarge-lists.icann.org

https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/finance-sc

_______________________________________________
Finance-sc mailing list
Finance-sc at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/finance-sc

-- 
NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or
subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named
addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by
mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. 