[Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

Fri Jun 6 11:23:48 UTC 2014

Many thanks Marika

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings at icann.org] 
Sent: 06 June 2014 11:39
To: Jonathan Robinson; 'Suzanne Radell'; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

Hi Jonathan,

I've create a page for work track I (see
https://community.icann.org/x/b6fhAg) on which I've posted both the document
outlining the different options under consideration (latest version) as well
as the draft liaison specification. These documents can be easily updated if
further changes are made before London and are clearly marked as documents
under review. Idem for work track II: https://community.icann.org/x/cqfhAg.
Let me know if there is anything else you need at this stage.

Best regards,

Marika

From: Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com>
Date: Friday 6 June 2014 11:33
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, 'Suzanne Radell'
<SRadell at ntia.doc.gov>, "GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org" <GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org>
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

Yes please Marika.  

Please post the current versions and provide the links asap.  

That way, any changes will also remain current.

Also, please also create a (currently empty page) and provide the link to it
for the Liaison specification.

Once the Liaison specification has been reviewed and/or agreed by the group,
we can upload it to that page.

Jonathan

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings at icann.org] 
Sent: 04 June 2014 13:46
To: Jonathan Robinson; 'Suzanne Radell'; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

I've added the link for the survey to the attached version. For items B and
C, we could also post the latest version of the documents under discussion
to the wiki (and create a separate page for each initiative) and link to
that? 

Best regards,

Marika

From: Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com>
Date: Wednesday 4 June 2014 13:52
To: 'Suzanne Radell' <SRadell at ntia.doc.gov>, "GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org"
<GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

Hi Suzanne,

I believe we have three objectives:

1.       Circulate the briefing note to ensure GAC & GNSO are as informed as
possible and as soon as possible

2.       Continue with refining our work ahead of London

3.       Prepare a presentation for London

Now, clearly 1-3 above have to be self-consistent and, to the extent that we
can make use of the briefing note to prepare for key issues we want answers
to, then the briefing note should do that.

With that in mind, I have attached the latest version of the briefing note
(downgraded to DRAFT J )with three highlights where I need a link if
possible (from Marika?), certainly for A.  
With B & C, they currently point to the mailing list which may be adequate?
Especially since we will continue to refine on lust

A.      Survey

B.      Work Track 1

C.      Work Track 2

There is no current plan to provide attachments but rather links described
above.

Have a look at the attached  and with the above in mind, please could you or
Manal give your best steer as to whether or not we further refine the
briefing note or send as is.

Thanks,

Jonathan

From: Suzanne Radell [mailto:SRadell at ntia.doc.gov] 
Sent: 03 June 2014 18:53
To: Jonathan Robinson; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

Hi Jonathan, and apologies for taking longer than expected.  I just sent an
email out in the past five minutes.  Please let me know what you think.  One
possible solution to avoiding a further delay in getting the briefing note
out is to send the note out as it, with whatever edits you've received to
date, and hold off on the attachments (write ups of the day to day and PDP
work to date) pending further refinements.  Would that help?  Cheers, Suz

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 1:39 PM
To: Suzanne Radell; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

Thanks Suzanne.  Just checking, would like me to hold off on finalising the
Briefing Note prior to you providing additional information / input?
Jonathan

From: Suzanne Radell [mailto:SRadell at ntia.doc.gov] 
Sent: 02 June 2014 22:01
To: Jonathan Robinson; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

Thanks, Jonathan; glad to know the edits were helpful.  I plan to look over
the material tonight and since we have cancelled tomorrow's 9 a.m. call, I
am shooting for a suggested approach tomorrow before noon my time; will that
work?  Cheers, Suz

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 4:58 PM
To: Suzanne Radell; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

OK thanks Suzanne.  Your edits definitely improve the document so definitely
a case of better late than never.

When do you think you can get the additional thoughts on the PDP track or
are those not a condition for finalising the briefing?

Looking at your note below, I suspect that they are intended for the
presentation to be delivered in London.  Am I correct?

Key point is to get the briefing out ASAP i.e. sufficiently ahead of London.
Jonathan.

From: Suzanne Radell [mailto:SRadell at ntia.doc.gov] 
Sent: 02 June 2014 19:31
To: Jonathan Robinson; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note
Importance: High

Thanks, Jonathan, and apologies to all for not getting these suggested edits
in sooner; I hope they can be taken into account.  The edits relate to the
survey, which I have understood as an important first step in determining
whether the existing/current means by which GAC members are informed about
upcoming PDPs at the initial stage has value/utility or needs to be
reconsidered.  It has been my impression that we intended to emphasize the
importance of getting feedback on this stage from the GAC during our
exchange in London.  I have some additional thoughts to share on the
presentation of the PDP portion of our work and will do so separately.
Thanks, Suz

From:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 12:44 PM
To: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

All,

I have revised the briefing note to accommodate suggested changes / inputs.

Some of the comments suggestions pertained more to our work as a group so we
need to pick that up on list or in our meetings.

Please see attached the final version in word (in case last-minute changes
are needed) and in PDF (for distribution) formats.

Thanks,

Jonathan

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140606/8a81bd3c/attachment-0001.html>