[Gac-gnso-cg] Action items / notes from 10/6 meeting

[Marika Konings]

Dear All,

Please find below the action items / notes from today's GAC-GNSO
Consultation Group meeting. Note the deadline of Friday 13 June to provide
input on the proposed requirements & proposed selection process for the GNSO
liaison to the GAC (attached here again for your convenience). The next
meeting of the Consultation Group is scheduled for Tuesday 17 June at 13.00
UTC.

Best regards,

Marika

Action Items / Notes 10/6 Meeting

Work Track I
* CG members to provide comments by Friday 13 June at the latest on proposed
requirements & proposed selection process for GNSO liaison to the GAC
* Include GAC liaison document as a link in the various materials instead of
circulating separately not to create 'document overload' (note - this has
already been included as a link in the briefing document)
* Include draft watermark to document to make clear it is a draft as well as
pdf format to make clear there is scope for input from GAC as well as GNSO
Work Track II
* Present first two steps during joint meeting (Issue Scoping & Initiation)
* Show chart with all PDP phases - Marika to send revised PDP graphic to
Manal and Jonathan
* Use feedback on survey to determine if/how input from GAC can/should be
triggered during first two steps
* Suzanne to review comments / questions section in curent document
* What is impact of GAC involvement early on? Re. timing for example.
* Consider whether a 'quick' look procedure could be appropriate for the GAC
to provide input on the Preliminary Issue Report (and be able to flag
whether or not at the Issue Scoping phase there are any public policy
concerns that may need to be considered)
* Objective: make GAC aware of all mechanisms available to provide input;
enable GAC to provide input in a timely / meaningful way; if/when GAC
decides to provide input, what are the consequences as well as impact on
timing; how to manage multiple PDPs going on in parallel.
* Further consideration may need to be given to additional (staff) support
to be able for the GAC to provide early input
* 'Triage' committee on the GAC side may also be an option to explore to be
able to deal with requests coming in and/or manage 'quick look' procedure
* Add some bullets on ideas shared to presentation, noting that these are
suggestions / ideas at this stages and not recommendations (yet)


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140610/a385b1c7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO Liaison to the GAC - DRAFT 06 June 2014.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 33280 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140610/a385b1c7/GNSOLiaisontotheGAC-DRAFT06June2014-0001.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5056 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140610/a385b1c7/smime-0001.p7s>