[Gac-gnso-cg] Action items / notes from 10/6 meeting

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Sorry I missed the call.  I thought I would make it to my hotel in
Berlin in time for the call, but my flight was delayed and I just got here.

avri


On 10-Jun-14 16:05, Marika Konings wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Please find below the action items / notes from today's GAC-GNSO
> Consultation Group meeting. Note the _deadline of Friday 13 June_ to
> provide input on the proposed requirements & proposed selection process
> for the GNSO liaison to the GAC (attached here again for your
> convenience). The next meeting of the Consultation Group is scheduled
> for Tuesday 17 June at 13.00 UTC.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> *Action Items / Notes 10/6 Meeting*
> 
> /Work Track I/
> 
>   * CG members to provide comments by Friday 13 June at the latest on
>     proposed requirements & proposed selection process for GNSO liaison
>     to the GAC
>   * Include GAC liaison document as a link in the various materials
>     instead of circulating separately not to create 'document overload'
>     (note - this has already been included as a link in the briefing
>     document)
>   * Include draft watermark to document to make clear it is a draft as
>     well as pdf format to make clear there is scope for input from GAC
>     as well as GNSO
> 
> /Work Track II/
> 
>   * Present first two steps during joint meeting (Issue Scoping &
>     Initiation)
>   * Show chart with all PDP phases - Marika to send revised PDP graphic
>     to Manal and Jonathan
>   * Use feedback on survey to determine if/how input from GAC can/should
>     be triggered during first two steps
>   * Suzanne to review comments / questions section in curent document
>   * What is impact of GAC involvement early on? Re. timing for example.
>   * Consider whether a 'quick' look procedure could be appropriate for
>     the GAC to provide input on the Preliminary Issue Report (and be
>     able to flag whether or not at the Issue Scoping phase there are any
>     public policy concerns that may need to be considered)
>   * Objective: make GAC aware of all mechanisms available to provide
>     input; enable GAC to provide input in a timely / meaningful way;
>     if/when GAC decides to provide input, what are the consequences as
>     well as impact on timing; how to manage multiple PDPs going on in
>     parallel.
>   * Further consideration may need to be given to additional (staff)
>     support to be able for the GAC to provide early input
>   * 'Triage' committee on the GAC side may also be an option to explore
>     to be able to deal with requests coming in and/or manage 'quick
>     look' procedure
>   * Add some bullets on ideas shared to presentation, noting that these
>     are suggestions / ideas at this stages and not recommendations (yet)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gac-gnso-cg mailing list
> Gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
>