[Gac-gnso-cg] Action items / notes from 10/6 meeting

[Manal Ismail]

It's ok Avri .. I already thought you won't be able to make it, based on
the doodle poll .. Thank you for trying !!

The transcripts and recordings are now available .. Please let us know
if you have any comments ..

Kind Regards
--Manal

-----Original Message-----
From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 4:23 PM
To: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Action items / notes from 10/6 meeting

Hi,

Sorry I missed the call.  I thought I would make it to my hotel in
Berlin in time for the call, but my flight was delayed and I just got
here.

avri


On 10-Jun-14 16:05, Marika Konings wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Please find below the action items / notes from today's GAC-GNSO
> Consultation Group meeting. Note the _deadline of Friday 13 June_ to
> provide input on the proposed requirements & proposed selection
process
> for the GNSO liaison to the GAC (attached here again for your
> convenience). The next meeting of the Consultation Group is scheduled
> for Tuesday 17 June at 13.00 UTC.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> *Action Items / Notes 10/6 Meeting*
> 
> /Work Track I/
> 
>   * CG members to provide comments by Friday 13 June at the latest on
>     proposed requirements & proposed selection process for GNSO
liaison
>     to the GAC
>   * Include GAC liaison document as a link in the various materials
>     instead of circulating separately not to create 'document
overload'
>     (note - this has already been included as a link in the briefing
>     document)
>   * Include draft watermark to document to make clear it is a draft as
>     well as pdf format to make clear there is scope for input from GAC
>     as well as GNSO
> 
> /Work Track II/
> 
>   * Present first two steps during joint meeting (Issue Scoping &
>     Initiation)
>   * Show chart with all PDP phases - Marika to send revised PDP
graphic
>     to Manal and Jonathan
>   * Use feedback on survey to determine if/how input from GAC
can/should
>     be triggered during first two steps
>   * Suzanne to review comments / questions section in curent document
>   * What is impact of GAC involvement early on? Re. timing for
example.
>   * Consider whether a 'quick' look procedure could be appropriate for
>     the GAC to provide input on the Preliminary Issue Report (and be
>     able to flag whether or not at the Issue Scoping phase there are
any
>     public policy concerns that may need to be considered)
>   * Objective: make GAC aware of all mechanisms available to provide
>     input; enable GAC to provide input in a timely / meaningful way;
>     if/when GAC decides to provide input, what are the consequences as
>     well as impact on timing; how to manage multiple PDPs going on in
>     parallel.
>   * Further consideration may need to be given to additional (staff)
>     support to be able for the GAC to provide early input
>   * 'Triage' committee on the GAC side may also be an option to
explore
>     to be able to deal with requests coming in and/or manage 'quick
>     look' procedure
>   * Add some bullets on ideas shared to presentation, noting that
these
>     are suggestions / ideas at this stages and not recommendations
(yet)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gac-gnso-cg mailing list
> Gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
> 
_______________________________________________
Gac-gnso-cg mailing list
Gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg