[Gnso-bylaws-dt] Proposed Agenda: Drafting Team Meeting 02 October at 21:00 UTC

Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
Wed Oct 2 20:48:46 UTC 2019


All,

see comments inserted.

Looking forward for the discussion.

Wolf-Ulrich


Am 01.10.2019 um 05:35 schrieb Heather Forrest:
> Dear DT colleagues,
>
> We are scheduled to meet for one final time to discuss the 3.1, 3.2 
> and 3.3 documents, and sign these off. As yet we have spent most of 
> our time in 3.1, and with our supplemental call, I believe we resolved 
> the issue of "standing" (so to speak) to make a petition to remove a 
> board member. That means we need to cover all of the outstanding 
> questions in 3.2. Ariel has already carried over into 3.3 (Board 
> Recall) all of our edits developed in discussing 3.1. There appear to 
> be no outstanding issues in 3.3; if you believe that there are 
> outstanding issues requiring discussion in 3.3 in this week's call, 
> please could you note this on the list prior to our call. If there are 
> no concerns notified about 3.3, I propose to focus our time on 3.2, 
> and specifically the outstanding queries.
>
> To make the call as efficient as possible, I have listed below the 
> outstanding questions lingering in 3.2:
>
> 3.2 SO/AC Director Removal:
>
>   * clause 4.2.2 Requirements for an SO/AC Director Removal Petition:
>     Suppose a petition is made, and it doesn't meet the requirements
>     (these, as set out in 4.2.2, are pretty basic). Can another, new
>     application be immediately submitted? Any limit on the timing
>     between the old and new application? I personally am not convinced
>     that this is a major issue that needs addressing, given how basic
>     the requirements of 4.2.2 are. Note the related comment in 4.2.3
>     (ie, if GNSO Council leadership finds that the petition doesn't
>     meet requirements, can applicant immediately resubmit?) Julie and
>     David agree that immediate submission isn't appropriate. Again,
>     I'm not convinced it's a major problem, unless we're thinking we
>     are going to have vexatious filings.
>
WUK: agree with Julie and David
>
>   * clause 4.2.5: GNSO Community Feedback on Certified SO/AC Director
>     Removal Petition: Should both Houses be invited to give feedback
>     on the one House's director? Given that the feedback is not
>     dispositive of the outcome, but merely to inform a decision by
>     Council, I personally am of the view that feedback from the
>     "other" House shouldn't be prevented. I believe the wording here
>     ("especially for those that belong in the applicable GNSO House
>     that appointed the affected Director") make clear that the
>     emphasis is on affected House, and is appropriate, but no need to
>     go further to restrict the other House from "provid[ing] feedback,
>     opinions, or comments on the merits of the Petition."
>
WUK: agree
>
>   * clause 4.2.6 GNSO Council Decision on Whether to Accept an SO/AC
>     Director Removal Petition: Since the voting requirement is at
>     least 3/4 of the Councilors from the GNSO House that appointed the
>     affected Director, does the entire Council need to meet for this
>     vote? I believe that we should not set a precedent of only some
>     Councillors meeting. The GNSO Operating Procedures make clear that
>     we need quorum for a meeting to be held, and that's both Houses.
>     So yes, I believe that the entire Council (both Houses) should
>     meet. I believe that Ariel's added text in red ("The GNSO House
>     that appointed the affected Director shall submit the motion for a
>     vote by the GNSO Council.") is excellent and makes good sense.
>
WUK: in case the petition is submitted by somebody from the other house 
- or from elsewhere - could you imagine how enthusiastically the motion 
would be drafted? Shouldn't it be a task for the council leadership?
>
>   * clause 5.2.2 GNSO Community Feedback After SO/AC Director Removal
>     Community Forum: I believe that Ariel's added text in red ("All
>     GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies are free to participate
>     in this Comment Period in accordance with their own internal
>     procedures and Bylaws.") work very well to specify what goes on in
>     the Community Forum.
>
WUK: agree
>
> Best wishes to all as we near the finish line,
>
> Heather
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 8:26 AM Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org 
> <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>> wrote:
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     Please see the following proposed agenda for the Drafting Team
>     meeting on *Wednesday, 02 October at21:00 UTC for 60 minutes.*
>
>     For a list of all draft documents including the current versions,
>     see the wiki at:
>     https://community.icann.org/display/GBIDT/Templates+and+Guidelines.
>
>     Draft Proposed Agenda
>
>      1. Review Agenda/Updates to Statements of Interest
>      2. Finalize Discussion:
>
>     *3.1 (Nominating Committee Director Removal):
>     *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YYeAMR5J7a4zN2zTE4LA_hp7sLynsKIqUnQgMWccAy4/edit#
>     [docs.google.com]
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1YYeAMR5J7a4zN2zTE4LA-5Fhp7sLynsKIqUnQgMWccAy4_edit&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=juxHsQ3WGX9g1l41cWOd7Ia02L5jVQD3LvwM7Bkxz_Q&s=oA4vyspZdbdvVAKVy-gcqYVTMekLdQ99rnS96vx8KLY&e=>
>
>     *3.2 (SO/AC Director Removal):
>     *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T5AUnP-egEPqs9CDoWOzNUmc0dPFROTOlLWPq10QoOc/edit#heading=h.herry8rlp3ok
>     [docs.google.com]
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1T5AUnP-2DegEPqs9CDoWOzNUmc0dPFROTOlLWPq10QoOc_edit-23heading-3Dh.herry8rlp3ok&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=juxHsQ3WGX9g1l41cWOd7Ia02L5jVQD3LvwM7Bkxz_Q&s=3O8g_14UBg0BSBppl4uEHhQr8DC8zChuzxHHDsB3jLU&e=>
>
>     *      3.3 (Board Recall):
>     *https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fSv0ELSGLmaABoz2_DKXHRsHrG-MyihPR1ePpbmamDU/edit#
>     [docs.google.com]
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1fSv0ELSGLmaABoz2-5FDKXHRsHrG-2DMyihPR1ePpbmamDU_edit&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=juxHsQ3WGX9g1l41cWOd7Ia02L5jVQD3LvwM7Bkxz_Q&s=B2KEnwLp3FPY0C5y_36DNSOs_Jr0MCvQvH7_1lnI0kQ&e=>
>
>      3. AOB
>
>     Kind regards,
>
>     Julie & Ariel
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list
>     Gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-bylaws-dt
>     _______________________________________________
>     By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
>     your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing
>     list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
>     (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
>     Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the
>     Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>     configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
>     delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation),
>     and so on.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list
> Gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-bylaws-dt
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-bylaws-dt/attachments/20191002/edc0845b/attachment.html>


More information about the Gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list