[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Straw poll on number of options

[Dillon, Chris]

Dear Petter,

Thank you for voting. Your vote is noted.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

From: Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu<mailto:petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu>>
Reply-To: Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu<mailto:petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu>>
Date: Wednesday, 26 November 2014 21:17
To: Chris Dillon <c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk<mailto:c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk>>
Cc: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Straw poll on number of options

Dear All,

As I presume that I cannot convince all of you to vote in favour of mandatory translation/transliteration, my vote is:

No

All the best,
Petter

--
Petter Rindforth, LL M

Fenix Legal KB
Stureplan 4c, 4tr
114 35 Stockholm
Sweden
Fax: +46(0)8-4631010
Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360
E-mail: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu<mailto:petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu>
www.fenixlegal.eu


NOTICE
This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail.
Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu
Thank you


25 november 2014, Dillon, Chris <c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk<mailto:c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk>> skrev:

Dear colleagues,



During Thursday's call, we had a straw poll:

Are you in favor of having only one option in the initial report?

As you know, in the versions of the draft initial report until now there have been two options (recommendations for and against mandatory transformation), but if it is possible to have only one, the report will likely have a stronger effect. Whatever the result of the report, the arguments for and against will remain in it; this poll only concerns the options.

Please send your vote to the list if you did not vote on Thursday. The options are: Yes, No and Abstain.

Please vote by 14:00 UTC on Thursday 27 November. (Note that there is no meeting on that day; the next one is 4 December.)



In summary

- This is not a consensus call on the options.

- This is to decide whether the initial report should have one set of recommendations or two sets of recommendations.

- If a majority believes it should be only one set, the WG, at a later stage (probably during our next meeting, on 4 December) will decide which set it will be.

- Please bear in mind that this is the initial report and following public comments on it we will be able to modify/amend/change/reverse our draft recommendations.



Incidentally, I shall email soon asking for your comments on version 5 of the report and including the rest of mine.



Regards,



Chris.

--

Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg/attachments/20141126/3b4fbc5e/attachment.html>