[Gnso-epdp-team] [Ext] Re: FW: Response from ICANN Compliance re. registrations under the 2009 RAA

[Ayden Férdeline]

Thanks Marika, that language would work for me.

Best wishes,

Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, February 7, 2019 1:07 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:

> Ayden, Alan, all,
>
> Having followed this thread, could this be resolved by just adding the words in bold to the language suggested by Ayden:
>
> Recognizing that in the case of some existing registrations, there may be an Administrative Contact but no or incomplete Registered Name Holder contact information, the EPDP team recommends that prior to eliminating Administrative Contact fields, all Registrars must ensure that each registration contains Registered Name Holder contact information.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Caitlin, Berry and Marika
>
> From: Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> Reply-To: Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> Date: Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 10:43
> To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, Kurt Pritz <kurt at kjpritz.com>, "gnso-epdp-team at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] [Ext] Re: FW: Response from ICANN Compliance re. registrations under the 2009 RAA
>
>>>>> Recognizing that in the case of some existing registrations, there may be an Administrative Contact but no or incomplete Registered Name Holder contact information, the EPDP team recommends that prior to eliminating Administrative Contact fields, all Registrars must ensure that each registration contains contact information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20190207/aef0c358/attachment.html>