[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Public comment status for our Initial Report

[Paul Keating]

Phil,

The following was in the GAC comments:

"Working Group Recommendation #4 (jurisdictional immunity), which suggests a
form of workaround, is incompatible with the position conveyed by the Legal
Counsels of IGOs which was provided to the Working Group at its request ³

I do not recall ever seeing such a position in writing and do not recall one
being given orally.  Do you?  If so can you please share it with me?

Also, I find it odd that the author states that the GAC cannot form a
consensus as to whether 6Ter satisfies the standing requirement of the UDRP
(1st Element).  I was unaware of this previously.  Nevertheless their
failure to reach consensus does not move me to alter our position.


Thank you.

   
From:  <gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Phil Corwin
<psc at vlaw-dc.com>
Date:  Monday, March 13, 2017 at 6:08 PM
To:  "gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org" <gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org>, Mary Wong
<mary.wong at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Public comment status for our Initial
Report

> FYI, while the co-chairs have not made a final decision we may well hold a WG
> meeting the last week of March to start detailed review and discussion of the
> comments already filed by then.
> 
> Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
> Virtualaw LLC
> 1155 F Street NW
> Suite 1050
> Washington, DC 20004
> 202-559-8597/Direct
> 202-559-8750/Fax
> 202-255-6172/Cell
> 
> Twitter: @VlawDC
> 
> "Luck is the residue of design" --- Branch Rickey
> From: mary.wong at icann.org
> Sent: March 13, 2017 5:57 PM
> To: gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> Subject: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Public comment status for our Initial Report
> 
> Dear Working Group members,
>  
> Although we are not planning to go into a detailed review of all the public
> comments submitted to date at our ICANN58 Working Group session this
> Wednesday, you may wish to note that a number of comments have already come
> in. The most recent filing was from the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC),
> which was posted yesterday:
> https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-igo-ingo-crp-access-initial-20jan17/doc
> xQl32KXGyH1.docx. The full list of comments and commenters so far can be
> viewed here: 
> https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-igo-ingo-crp-access-initial-20jan17/.
>  
> Staff are compiling the comments as they come in into a tabular format, for
> easier review by the group. We will try to circulate an initial version of
> this tool as soon as we can.
>  
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary and Steve 
> _______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/attachments/20170313/2a79f6a5/attachment-0001.html>