[Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] Please Review by 29 Jan. - Data Analysis Scoping Paper - Existing Registrations

[Fabien Betremieux]

Theo, 

Please see our response to your question below for your consideration
prior to our meeting tomorrow.

Best Regards
Fabien

-----Original Message-----
From: gtheo <gtheo at xs4all.nl>
Date: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 10:44 AM
To: Fabien Betremieux <fabien.betremieux at icann.org>
Cc: "gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org" <gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] Please Review by 29 Jan. - Data
Analysis Scoping Paper - Existing Registrations

>Thanks for drafting this Fabien,
>
>The scope of the analysis displays the "choke points" rather well. What
>also might cause delays is, if a Registrar is required to obtain
>"registrant" consent. Like we determined on the call this is a moving
>target and the further we move in the future we might encounter changed
>dynamics.
>
>Has the subject of organizing this entire thing already been discussed ?


This topic was discussed in our IRT meetings on 24 June 2015 (ICANN 53
meeting) and 4 August 2015 (conference call) based on the findings of the
Legal Review Memo. It is our understanding that each Registrar will
determine its own approach based on its circumstances, which is likely to
vary depending on geographical dispersion of customer base, applicable
jurisdiction and distribution model, among other parameters.



> 
>Getting all Registrars ready might be a challenge also. Missing
>deadlines, Registrars that cannot be reached or simply do not reply,
>there are tons of factors here that might slow things down.
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>Theo Geurts
>Compliance & Policy Officer
>
>Realtime Register B.V. Abuse Dept.
>
>Ceintuurbaan 32A
>8024 AA - ZWOLLE - The Netherlands
>
>T: +31.384530759
>F: +31.384524734
>U: www.realtimeregister.com
>E: legal at realtimeregister.com
>
>
>
>
>
>Fabien Betremieux schreef op 2016-01-27 12:23 AM:
>> Dear IRT Members,
>> 
>> In our meeting on 13 January 2016, we further discussed need to
>> conduct data analysis to better understand the type of challenges we
>> may face when transitioning existing registrations in .COM, .NET and
>> .JOBS from thin to thick Whois.
>> 
>> It was agreed among IRT participants that we should reach out to the
>> Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) and assemble a team of volunteers
>> to conduct such analysis. We would like to confirm that this topic
>> will be on the agenda of the RrSG meeting in Marrakech during ICANN
>> 55. We will provide more details when available.
>> 
>> Additionally, as discussed during our IRT meeting, we have drafted a
>> scoping paper for this analysis (attached). We are targeting to
>> forward this paper to the RrSG on Monday 1 February. In the meantime,
>> we would like to request you review this paper and share your edits by
>> this Friday 29 January COB in your time zone.
>> 
>> Please note that the scoping paper needs your input in the following
>> sections:
>> 
>> 	* Scope of analysis
>> 	* Thick Whois Data Requirements
>> 	* Next Steps and Expected Timeline
>> 
>> Thank you in advance for your time.
>> 
>> Best Regards
>> 
>> --
>> Fabien Betremieux
>> Sr. Registry Services & Engagement Manager
>> Global Domains Division, ICANN
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt mailing list
>> Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4608 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt/attachments/20160210/7b678b41/smime.p7s>